Bioethanol production from biomass: carbohydrate vs syngas fermentation. Issue 2 (12th November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kennes, David; Abubackar, Haris Nalakath; Diaz, Marío; Veiga, María C; Kennes, Christian
• Is Part Of: Journal of chemical technology & biotechnology. Volume 91:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 304
• Page End: 317
• Publication Date: 2015-11-12
• Subjects: carbon monoxide -- Clostridium -- lignocellulose -- Saccharomyces -- syngas; Biotechnology -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Technical -- Periodicals; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Industries -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 660
• DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4842
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-2575

Abstract

Abstract: Environmental problems associated with the use of fossil fuels as well as their expected scarcity in the near future requires a search for new alternative fuels produced from renewable sources. Bioethanol is a biofuel that can be obtained from biomass and waste as feedstocks through fermentation. Two major routes allow conversion of the feedstocks to fermentable substrates, i.e. the hydrolytic route and the thermochemical route. In the hydrolytic route, the feedstock undergoes a pretreatment stage first, aimed at facilitating the subsequent hydrolytic treatment. Chemical, physical or biological pretreatments can be applied. Lignocellulosic feedstocks are mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The pretreatment attacks the lignin and hemicellulose polymers and makes cellulose more accessible in the next, hydrolytic, stage. The hydrolytic treatment uses enzymes to convert the cellulose polymer to simple, fermentable, sugars, mainly glucose. Simple sugars obtained from hemicellulose and cellulose are then fermented by yeasts to bioethanol. In the thermochemical alternative, the feedstock is gasified, yielding syngas – a mixture largely composed of CO, CO2 and H2 – which can be fermented anaerobically, usually by clostridia, to ethanol or other products. In both cases, downstream processes are then applied to recover and purify the biofuel. The different stages involved in both alternatives are described, and both processes are compared in terms of their main characteristics and development stage. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry