MiR‐204 is dysregulated in metastatic prostate cancer in vitro. Issue 2 (28th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Todorova, Krassimira; Metodiev, Metodi V.; Metodieva, Gergana; Zasheva, Diana; Mincheff, Milcho; Hayrabedyan, Soren
• Is Part Of: Molecular carcinogenesis. Volume 55:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 131
• Page End: 147
• Publication Date: 2015-01-28
• Subjects: (MeSH) -- Micro RNA -- Transcription Factor -- Oncogene Fusion -- DNA Methylation -- LTQ Orbitrap Velos Proteomics; Carcinogenesis -- Molecular aspects -- Periodicals; 616.994071
• DOI: 10.1002/mc.22263
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-1987

Abstract

Abstract : During cancer progression, the genome instability incurred rearrangement could possibly turn some of the tumor suppressor micro‐RNAs into pro‐oncogenic ones. We aimed to investigate miR‐204 in the context of prostate cancer progression using a cell line model of different levels of genome instability (LNCaP, PC3, VCaP and NCI H660), as demonstrated by the availability of ERG fusion. We studied the effect of miR‐204 modulation on master transcription factors important for lineage development, cell differentiation and prostate cancer bone marrow metastasis. We followed c‐MYB, ETS1 and RUNX2 transcript and protein expression and the miR‐204 affected global proteome. We further investigated if these transcription factors exert an effect on miR‐204 expression (qPCR, luciferase reporter assay) by silencing them using esiRNA. We found dualistic miR‐204 effects, either acting as a tumor suppressor on c‐MYB, or as an oncomiR on ETS1. RUNX2 and ETS1 regulation by miR‐204 was ERG fusion dependent, demonstrating regulatory circuitry disruption in advanced metastatic models. miR‐204 also differentially affected mRNA splicing and protein stability. miR‐204 levels were found dependent on cancer hypermethylation and supported by positive feedback induced by all three transcription factors. In this regulatory circuitry among miR‐204, c‐MYB, RUNX2 and ETS1, the c‐MYB was found to induce all three other members, but its expression was differentially affected by the methylation status in lymph node vs. bone metastasis. We demonstrate that not only tumor suppressor micro‐RNA loss, but also significant genome rearrangement‐driven regulatory loop perturbations play a role in the advanced cancer progression, conferring better pro‐survival and metastatic potential. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.