Latent growth curve analysis with dichotomous items: Comparing four approaches. (7th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ye, Feifei
• Is Part Of: British journal of mathematical & statistical psychology. Volume 69:Part 1(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 43
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2015-06-07
• Subjects: growth curve analysis -- Bayesian -- hierarchical generalized linear model; Psychometrics -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Mathematical models -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 150.727
• DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1102

Abstract

Abstract : A Monte Carlo study was used to compare four approaches to growth curve analysis of subjects assessed repeatedly with the same set of dichotomous items: A two‐step procedure first estimating latent trait measures using MULTILOG and then using a hierarchical linear model to examine the changing trajectories with the estimated abilities as the outcome variable; a structural equation model using modified weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimation; and two approaches in the framework of multilevel item response models, including a hierarchical generalized linear model using Laplace estimation, and Bayesian analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). These four methods have similar power in detecting the average linear slope across time. MCMC and Laplace estimates perform relatively better on the bias of the average linear slope and corresponding standard error, as well as the item location parameters. For the variance of the random intercept, and the covariance between the random intercept and slope, all estimates are biased in most conditions. For the random slope variance, only Laplace estimates are unbiased when there are eight time points.