Seasonal cycles of O3 in the marine boundary layer: Observation and model simulation comparisons. Issue 1 (14th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parrish, D. D.; Galbally, I. E.; Lamarque, J.‐F.; Naik, V.; Horowitz, L.; Shindell, D. T.; Oltmans, S. J.; Derwent, R.; Tanimoto, H.; Labuschagne, C.; Cupeiro, M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 538
• Page End: 557
• Publication Date: 2016-01-14
• Subjects: seasonal cycle -- ozone -- marine boundary layer -- model‐measurement comparison; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JD024101
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: We present a two‐step approach for quantitatively comparing modeled and measured seasonal cycles of O3 : (1) fitting sine functions to monthly averaged measurements and model results (i.e., deriving a Fourier series expansion of these results) and (2) comparing the phase and amplitude of the statistically significant terms between the models and measurements. Two and only two sine terms are sufficient to quantify the O3 seasonal cycle in the marine boundary layer (MBL) in both the measurements and the model results. In addition to the expected fundamental (one sine cycle per year), a second harmonic term (i.e., two sine cycles per year) is identified as a ubiquitous feature of O3 in the MBL. Three chemistry climate models (Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry, GFDL‐CM3, and GISS‐E2‐R) approximately reproduce many features of the measured seasonal cycles at MBL surface sites throughout the globe, with some notable quantitative disagreements, but give divergent results that do not agree with O3 sonde measurements above the MBL. This disagreement and divergence of results between models indicate that the treatment of the MBL dynamics in the chemistry‐climate models is not adequate to reproduce the isolation of the MBL indicated by the observations. Within the MBL the models more accurately reproduce the second harmonic term than the fundamental term. We attribute the second harmonic term to the second harmonic of opposite phase in the photolysis rate of O3, while the fundamental term evidently has many influences. The parameters derived from the Fourier series expansion of the measurements are quantitative metrics that can serve as the basis for future model‐measurement comparisons. Key Points: A second harmonic term (2 cycles/yr) is identified as a ubiquitous feature of ozone in the MBL Quantitative metrics are provided to serve as the basis for future model‐measurement comparisons The treatment of MBL dynamics in CCMs is not adequate to reproduce the isolation of the MBL