Site‐scale variability of streambank fluvial erodibility parameters as measured with a jet erosion test. Issue 26 (22nd July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Daly, E. R.; Fox, G. A.; Enlow, H. K.; Storm, D. E.; Hunt, S. L.
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 29:Issue 26(2015:Dec.)
• Page Start: 5451
• Page End: 5464
• Publication Date: 2015-07-22
• Subjects: cohesive soil erosion -- erodibility -- excess shear stress equation -- sample size -- soil variability -- streambank erosion; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10547
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: The erosion rate of cohesive streambanks is typically modelled using the excess shear stress equation, dependent on two erodibility parameters: critical shear stress and erodibility coefficient. The jet erosion test (JET) has become the most common method for estimating these erodibility parameters in situ . Typically, results from a few JETs are averaged to acquire a single set of parameters for characterizing a streambank layer; however, this may be inadequate for accurately characterizing erodibility. The research objectives were to investigate the variability of JET results from assumed homogeneous streambank layers and to estimate the number of JETs required to accurately characterize erodibility for use in predictive models. On three unique streambanks in Oklahoma and across a range of erodibility, 20 to 30 JETs were conducted over a span of three days at each site. Unique to this research, each JET was analysed using the Blaisdell, scour depth and iterative solutions. The required sample size to accurately estimate the erodibility parameters depended on the JET solution technique, the parameter being estimated, and the degrees of precision and confidence. Conducting three to five JETs per soil layer on a streambank typically provided an order of magnitude estimate of the erodibility parameters. Because the parameters were log‐normally distributed, using empirical equations to predict erosion properties based on soil characteristics will likely contain high uncertainty and thus should be used with caution. This study exemplifies the need to conduct in situ measurements using the JET to accurately characterize streambank resistance to fluvial erosion. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.