Randomized clinical trial of perioperative nerve block and continuous local anaesthetic infiltration via wound catheter versus epidural analgesia in open liver resection (LIVER 2 trial). Issue 13 (8th October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of perioperative nerve block and continuous local anaesthetic infiltration via wound catheter versus epidural analgesia in open liver resection (LIVER 2 trial). Issue 13 (8th October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of perioperative nerve block and continuous local anaesthetic infiltration via wound catheter versus epidural analgesia in open liver resection (LIVER 2 trial)
- Authors:
- Hughes, M. J.
Harrison, E. M.
Peel, N. J.
Stutchfield, B.
McNally, S.
Beattie, C.
Wigmore, S. J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Analgesia after liver surgery remains controversial. A previous randomized trial of continuous wound infiltration (CWI) versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) after liver surgery (LIVER trial) showed a faster recovery time in the wound infiltration group but better early postoperative pain scores in the TEA group. High‐level evidence is, however, limited and opinion remains divided. The aim was to determine whether there is a difference in functional recovery time between patients having CWI plus abdominal nerve blocks versus TEA after liver resection. Methods: A randomized unblinded clinical trial of patients undergoing open liver resection was commenced in December 2012, with follow‐up to August 2014. Patients were randomized to receive either wound catheter and nerve block (CWI group) or TEA for 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome measure was functional recovery time. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, complication rates, inflammatory response and central venous pressure (CVP) during transection. Results: Of 50 patients randomized initially to each group, 44 received TEA and 49 CWI. Median (i.q.r.) recovery time was 6·5 (5–9·75) and 5·75 (4–7) days in the TEA and CWI groups respectively ( P = 0·036). Pain scores were not significantly different between the two groups, and there were no differences in morbidity, inflammatory response or CVP during transection. Conclusion: Wound infiltration is associated with a reduced time to recovery afterAbstract : Background: Analgesia after liver surgery remains controversial. A previous randomized trial of continuous wound infiltration (CWI) versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) after liver surgery (LIVER trial) showed a faster recovery time in the wound infiltration group but better early postoperative pain scores in the TEA group. High‐level evidence is, however, limited and opinion remains divided. The aim was to determine whether there is a difference in functional recovery time between patients having CWI plus abdominal nerve blocks versus TEA after liver resection. Methods: A randomized unblinded clinical trial of patients undergoing open liver resection was commenced in December 2012, with follow‐up to August 2014. Patients were randomized to receive either wound catheter and nerve block (CWI group) or TEA for 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome measure was functional recovery time. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, complication rates, inflammatory response and central venous pressure (CVP) during transection. Results: Of 50 patients randomized initially to each group, 44 received TEA and 49 CWI. Median (i.q.r.) recovery time was 6·5 (5–9·75) and 5·75 (4–7) days in the TEA and CWI groups respectively ( P = 0·036). Pain scores were not significantly different between the two groups, and there were no differences in morbidity, inflammatory response or CVP during transection. Conclusion: Wound infiltration is associated with a reduced time to recovery after open liver resection compared with epidural analgesia. TEA does not offer an advantage over CWI in terms of attenuation of the inflammatory response or pain scores. Registration number: NCT01747122 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). Abstract : Nerve block just as good … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 102:Issue 13(2015:Dec.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 13(2015:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 13 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 13
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0102-0013-0000
- Page Start:
- 1619
- Page End:
- 1628
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10-08
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9949 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1425.xml