Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Issue 11 (14th July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Issue 11 (14th July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation
- Authors:
- Pham, Tina
Patil, Sushrut
Fleming, Shaun
Avery, Sharon
Walker, Patricia
Wei, Andrew
Curtis, David
Stuart, Georgia
Klarica, Daniela
O'Brien, Maureen
Morris, Karen
Das, Tongted
Bollard, Geraldine
Muirhead, Jennifer
Coutsouvelis, John
Spencer, Andrew - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Nivestim is a biosimilar approved for the same indications as Neupogen including the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). The clinical efficacy and safety of Nivestim for this use have not been formally assessed in clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In our retrospective single‐center study we compared variables of PBSC mobilization and engraftment of 60 patients mobilized with Nivestim to that of 38 patients mobilized with Neupogen. RESULTS: We found no difference between Nivestim and Neupogen in peripheral blood CD34+ at first leukapheresis (47 × 10 6 cells/L vs. 60 × 10 6 cells/L, p = 0.48) nor the total CD34+ collected (5.37 × 10 6 /kg vs. 4.59 × 10 6 /kg, p = 0.22). However, a difference in the median number of leukapheresis procedures (one vs. two, p = 0.0007) was observed. Eighty‐one patients (51 Nivestim and 30 Neupogen mobilized) went on to transplantation. Median time to neutrophil engraftment (15 days vs. 13.5 days, p = 0.09) and platelet (PLT) engraftment (20 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.01) was longer in the Nivestim group. The significant delay in PLT engraftment did not, however, translate to increased PLT transfusions (two vs. three, p = 0.2) or impact significantly on hospitalization time for admissions within 30 days posttransplant (20 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Nivestim is as effective as Neupogen for PBSC mobilization; however, its use was associated with a delay in PLT recovery. AAbstract : BACKGROUND: Nivestim is a biosimilar approved for the same indications as Neupogen including the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). The clinical efficacy and safety of Nivestim for this use have not been formally assessed in clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In our retrospective single‐center study we compared variables of PBSC mobilization and engraftment of 60 patients mobilized with Nivestim to that of 38 patients mobilized with Neupogen. RESULTS: We found no difference between Nivestim and Neupogen in peripheral blood CD34+ at first leukapheresis (47 × 10 6 cells/L vs. 60 × 10 6 cells/L, p = 0.48) nor the total CD34+ collected (5.37 × 10 6 /kg vs. 4.59 × 10 6 /kg, p = 0.22). However, a difference in the median number of leukapheresis procedures (one vs. two, p = 0.0007) was observed. Eighty‐one patients (51 Nivestim and 30 Neupogen mobilized) went on to transplantation. Median time to neutrophil engraftment (15 days vs. 13.5 days, p = 0.09) and platelet (PLT) engraftment (20 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.01) was longer in the Nivestim group. The significant delay in PLT engraftment did not, however, translate to increased PLT transfusions (two vs. three, p = 0.2) or impact significantly on hospitalization time for admissions within 30 days posttransplant (20 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Nivestim is as effective as Neupogen for PBSC mobilization; however, its use was associated with a delay in PLT recovery. A prospective study should be conducted to confirm our findings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Transfusion. Volume 55:Issue 11(2015)
- Journal:
- Transfusion
- Issue:
- Volume 55:Issue 11(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 55, Issue 11 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0055-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2709
- Page End:
- 2713
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-14
- Subjects:
- Hematology -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals
Blood Group Antigens -- Periodicals
Blood Preservation -- Periodicals
Blood Transfusion -- Periodicals
615 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1537-2995 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=trf ↗
http://www.transfusion.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/trf.13233 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0041-1132
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9020.704000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2333.xml