Clinical evaluation of dengue RNA, NS1, and IgM for diagnosis of dengue in Southern China. Issue 1 (17th July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Xinliang; Chen, Rui; Gu, Wenshen; He, Jian; Cai, Weipeng; Li, Jiajia; Duan, Chaohui; Yan, Haiyan
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical virology. Volume 88:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 28
• Page End: 34
• Publication Date: 2015-07-17
• Subjects: dengue -- RNA -- NS1 -- IgM -- RT‐PCR -- ELISA; Virology -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24314
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6615

Abstract

Abstract : In 2014, a large outbreak of dengue occurred in Guangzhou, China. This outbreak prompted us to evaluate NS1 and RNA for the early diagnosis of acute dengue infection, in addition to the combination with IgM antibody. We aimed to find the differences of three assays about dengue diagnosis. This study was an evaluation of diagnosis test. Based on WHO criteria 2009, dengue RNA, NS1, and IgM/IgG were detected from 294 patients (180 dengue patients, 114 non‐dengue patients) by three diagnostic kits made in China. The χ 2 test, sensitivity, and specificity were used in statistical analysis. The ratios of dengue patients with low platelet counts (<100 × 10 9 /L 32.2%) or white blood cell counts (<4.0 × 10 9 /L 58.9%) were significantly higher compared to non‐dengue patients ( P < 0.05). Dengue NS1 was shown sensitive (93.9%) for diagnostic use. RNA had a better performance with 98.1% of sensitivity from day 1 to day 4 after illness onset. IgM performed better at day 5 or more with 74.0% of sensitivity. The diagnostic rate using a combination of RNA and IgM was 97.8% and 96.7% using NS1 and IgM. A patient with low platelet and white blood cell counts needs additional tests for dengue during an epidemic. RNA and NS1 were most valuable for early diagnosis of dengue, whereas IgM was best suited as a supplementary method for patients at day 5 or more after illness onset. J. Med. Virol. 88:28–34, 2016 . © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.