Effect of a new insulin treatment regimen on glycaemic control and quality of life of Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during Ramadan fast – an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised study. Issue 11 (31st July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of a new insulin treatment regimen on glycaemic control and quality of life of Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during Ramadan fast – an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised study. Issue 11 (31st July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Effect of a new insulin treatment regimen on glycaemic control and quality of life of Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during Ramadan fast – an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised study
- Authors:
- Shehadeh, N.
Maor, Y.
the Ramadan Study Group - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="ijcp12695-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>We performed a non‐inferiority trial comparing insulin detemir (Levemir) and biphasic insulin (NovoMix70) to standard care during Ramadan fast in insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This was an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised non‐inferiority study. Insulin treated T2DM patients from 12 randomly selected primary clinics received Levemir and NovoMix 70 (intervention, <italic>n</italic> = 127) or standard care according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations (control, <italic>n</italic> = 118). Insulin dose (intervention) was 60% of the usual, of this 40% was dosed as Levemir at sunrise and 60% as NovoMix 70 before dinner. Insulin was titrated according to daily 4 point self‐measured blood glucose (4P‐SMBG) levels. The primary outcome was the difference in mean daily 4P‐SMBG during days 23–30 of treatment. Mean age was 60.1 (SD 8.9) and 59.4 (SD 10.1) years in the intervention and control respectively. Mean HbA<sub>1c</sub> was 8.38% (68 mmol/mol) (SD 0.96) and 8.45% (69 mmol/mol) (SD 1.08). Mean BMI was 32.99 (SD 7.05) and 33.08 (SD 7.24), respectively. The intervention was non‐inferior to standard care as assessed by mean 4P‐SMBG during days 23–30 of treatment [155 (SD 30.76) mg% and 159 (SD 33.24) mg% respectively, p = 0.269]. Adverse event rate was significantly lower in the intervention group [0.04 (SD 0.06) vs. 0.07 (SD 0.11),<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ijcp12695-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>We performed a non‐inferiority trial comparing insulin detemir (Levemir) and biphasic insulin (NovoMix70) to standard care during Ramadan fast in insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This was an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised non‐inferiority study. Insulin treated T2DM patients from 12 randomly selected primary clinics received Levemir and NovoMix 70 (intervention, <italic>n</italic> = 127) or standard care according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations (control, <italic>n</italic> = 118). Insulin dose (intervention) was 60% of the usual, of this 40% was dosed as Levemir at sunrise and 60% as NovoMix 70 before dinner. Insulin was titrated according to daily 4 point self‐measured blood glucose (4P‐SMBG) levels. The primary outcome was the difference in mean daily 4P‐SMBG during days 23–30 of treatment. Mean age was 60.1 (SD 8.9) and 59.4 (SD 10.1) years in the intervention and control respectively. Mean HbA<sub>1c</sub> was 8.38% (68 mmol/mol) (SD 0.96) and 8.45% (69 mmol/mol) (SD 1.08). Mean BMI was 32.99 (SD 7.05) and 33.08 (SD 7.24), respectively. The intervention was non‐inferior to standard care as assessed by mean 4P‐SMBG during days 23–30 of treatment [155 (SD 30.76) mg% and 159 (SD 33.24) mg% respectively, p = 0.269]. Adverse event rate was significantly lower in the intervention group [0.04 (SD 0.06) vs. 0.07 (SD 0.11), p = 0.010]. In particular, hypoglycaemia event rate was lower in the intervention group [0.00 (SD 0.01) vs. 0.01 (SD 0.03), p ≤ 0.001]. To conclude, treatment with Levemir and NovoMix 70 was non‐inferior to standard care in this heterogeneous group of patients and was associated with less adverse events.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of clinical practice. Volume 69:Issue 11(2015)
- Journal:
- International journal of clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Issue 11(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 11 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0069-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1281
- Page End:
- 1288
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-31
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ijcp ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1742-1241 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1368-5031&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1742-1241 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ijcp.12695 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-5031
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.172160
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4213.xml