Analysis of the Role of Peripheral Ligands Coordinated to ZnII in Enhancing the Energy Barrier in Luminescent Linear Trinuclear Zn‐Dy‐Zn Single‐Molecule Magnets. Issue 44 (11th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Costes, Jean Pierre; Titos‐Padilla, Silvia; Oyarzabal, Itziar; Gupta, Tulika; Duhayon, Carine; Rajaraman, Gopalan; Colacio, Enrique
• Is Part Of: Chemistry. Volume 21:Issue 44(2015)
• Page Start: 15785
• Page End: 15796
• Publication Date: 2015-09-11
• Subjects: Chemistry -- Periodicals; 540
• DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501500
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0947-6539

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Three new Dy complexes have been prepared according to a complex‐as‐ligand strategy. Structural determinations indicate that the central Dy ion is surrounded by two LZn units (L<sup>2−</sup> is the di‐deprotonated form of the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> compartmental <italic>N</italic>, <italic>N</italic>′‐2, 2‐dimethylpropylenedi(3‐methoxysalicylideneiminato) Schiff base. The Dy ions are nonacoordinate to eight oxygen atoms from the two L ligands and to a water molecule. The Zn ions are pentacoordinate in all cases, linked to the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> atoms from L, and the apical position of the Zn coordination sphere is occupied by a water molecule or bromide or chloride ions. These resulting complexes, formulated (LZnX)‐Dy‐(LZnX), are tricationic with X=H<sub>2</sub>O and monocationic with X=Br or Cl. They behave as field‐free single‐molecule magnets (SMMs) with effective energy barriers (<italic>U</italic><sub>eff</sub>) for the reversal of the magnetization of 96.9(6) K with <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=2.4×10<sup>−7</sup> s, 146.8(5) K with <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=9.2×10<sup>−8</sup> s, and 146.1(10) K with <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=9.9×10<sup>−8</sup> s for compounds with ZnOH<sub>2</sub>, ZnBr, and ZnCl motifs, respectively. The Cole–Cole plots exhibit semicircular shapes with <italic>α</italic> parameters in the range of 0.19 to 0.29, which suggests multiple relaxation processes. Under a dc applied magnetic field of 1000 Oe, the quantum tunneling of magnetization (QTM) is partly or fully suppressed and the energy barriers increase to <italic>U</italic><sub>eff</sub>=128.6(5) K and <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=1.8×10<sup>−8</sup> s for <bold>1</bold>, <italic>U</italic><sub>eff</sub>=214.7 K and <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=9.8×10<sup>−9</sup> s for <bold>2</bold>, and <italic>U</italic><sub>eff</sub>=202.4 K and <italic>τ</italic><sub>0</sub>=1.5×10<sup>−8</sup> s for <bold>3</bold>. The two pairs of largely negatively charged phenoxido oxygen atoms with short DyO bonds are positioned at opposite sides of the Dy<sup>3+</sup> ion, which thus creates a strong crystal field that stabilizes the axial <italic>M<sub>J</sub></italic>=±15/2 doublet as the ground Kramers doublet. Although the compound with the ZnOH<sub>2</sub> motifs possesses the larger negative charges on the phenolate oxygen atoms, as confirmed by using DFT calculations, it exhibits the larger distortions of the DyO<sub>9</sub> coordination polyhedron from ideal geometries and a smaller <italic>U</italic><sub>eff</sub> value. Ab initio calculations support the easy‐axis anisotropy of the ground Kramers doublet and predict zero‐field SMM behavior through Orbach and TA‐QTM relaxations via the first excited Kramers doublet, which leads to large energy barriers. In accordance with the experimental results, ab initio calculations have also shown that, compared with water, the peripheral halide ligands coordinated to the Zn<sup>2+</sup> ions increase the barrier height when the distortions of the DyO<sub>9</sub> have a negative effect. All the complexes exhibit metal‐centered luminescence after excitation into the UV π–π* absorption band of ligand L<sup>2−</sup> at <italic>λ</italic>=335 nm, which results in the appearance of the characteristic Dy<sup>III</sup> (<sup>4</sup>F<sub>9/2</sub>→<sup>6</sup>H<sub><italic>J</italic>/2</sub>; <italic>J</italic>=15/2, 13/2) emission bands in the visible region.</p> </abstract>