Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography. Issue 2 (November 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography. Issue 2 (November 2015)
- Main Title:
- Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography
- Authors:
- Szymanski, Marek
Socha, Maciej W.
Kowalkowska, Magdalena E.
Zielińska, Izabela B.
Eljaszewicz, Andrzej
Szymanski, Wieslaw - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0005">To analyze the relationship between contrast kinetics in tumorous vessels and lesion histologic type in an attempt to differentiate between malignant and benign disease.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In a single-center prospective study, patients who had been referred for elective surgery because of a diagnosis of unilateral and/or bilateral adnexal masses were enrolled at Dr Jan Biziel University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland, between January 2012 and September 2013. Participants underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography examination (CEUS). Contrast kinetics were obtained and compared with the neovascularization of the tumor. Accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Among 160 enrolled patients, 84 underwent CEUS examination and 51 lesions were studied. Baseline and maximum color Doppler intensities were significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 for both). Similarly, the absolute and relative increases in color Doppler intensity were significantly higher in malignant tumors (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). The estimated positive predictive value was 97.1%, the negative predictive value was 100%, and the accuracy was 100%. Peak enhanced intensity of fractional<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0005">To analyze the relationship between contrast kinetics in tumorous vessels and lesion histologic type in an attempt to differentiate between malignant and benign disease.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In a single-center prospective study, patients who had been referred for elective surgery because of a diagnosis of unilateral and/or bilateral adnexal masses were enrolled at Dr Jan Biziel University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland, between January 2012 and September 2013. Participants underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography examination (CEUS). Contrast kinetics were obtained and compared with the neovascularization of the tumor. Accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Among 160 enrolled patients, 84 underwent CEUS examination and 51 lesions were studied. Baseline and maximum color Doppler intensities were significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 for both). Similarly, the absolute and relative increases in color Doppler intensity were significantly higher in malignant tumors (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). The estimated positive predictive value was 97.1%, the negative predictive value was 100%, and the accuracy was 100%. Peak enhanced intensity of fractional color Doppler Area and area under the time-intensity curve (S-parameter) correlated significantly with the histology of the lesion (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Probability curves demonstrated that higher S-parameter values were correlated with a higher risk of malignancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0025">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0020">Transvaginal CEUS is a reliable and reproducible way to differentiate between benign and malignant adnexal lesions.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 131:Issue 2(2015:Nov.)
- Journal:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics
- Issue:
- Volume 131:Issue 2(2015:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0131-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 147
- Page End:
- 151
- Publication Date:
- 2015-11
- Subjects:
- Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00207292 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207292 ↗
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18793479 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.047 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0020-7292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4115.xml