A model to predict upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Issue 5 (8th September 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A model to predict upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Issue 5 (8th September 2015)
- Main Title:
- A model to predict upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
- Authors:
- Kondo, Takafumi
Hayashi, Naoki
Ohde, Sachiko
Suzuki, Koyu
Yoshida, Atsushi
Yagata, Hiroshi
Niikura, Naoki
Iwamoto, Takayuki
Kida, Kumiko
Murai, Michiko
Takahashi, Yuko
Tsunoda, Hiroko
Nakamura, Seigo
Yamauchi, Hideko - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The aims of this study were to determine clinicopathological factors associated with postoperative upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to develop a model to predict the risk of upstaging.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Pre‐ and post‐operative pathological diagnoses and radiological findings were assessed for 1, 187 consecutive patients.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of the patients, 306 (25.8%) were upstaged on the surgical specimen. In multivariate analysis, the following four factors were significantly associated with upstaging: 1) the presence of sclerosing adenosis on the preoperative biopsy specimen (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, <italic>P</italic> = 0.013); 2) pleomorphic calcifications on the mammogram (OR 1.68, <italic>P</italic> = 0.009); 3) a mass suspicious for invasive carcinoma on ultrasonography and/or MRI (OR 2.13, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); 4) tumor size ≥2 cm on ultrasonography (OR 1.80, <italic>P</italic> = 0.032). HER2‐positive (OR 1.54, <italic>P</italic> = 0.062) and comedo necrosis (OR 1.42, <italic>P</italic> = 0.056) demonstrated a trend towards significance. A prediction model incorporating these<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The aims of this study were to determine clinicopathological factors associated with postoperative upstaging to invasive carcinoma in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to develop a model to predict the risk of upstaging.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Pre‐ and post‐operative pathological diagnoses and radiological findings were assessed for 1, 187 consecutive patients.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of the patients, 306 (25.8%) were upstaged on the surgical specimen. In multivariate analysis, the following four factors were significantly associated with upstaging: 1) the presence of sclerosing adenosis on the preoperative biopsy specimen (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, <italic>P</italic> = 0.013); 2) pleomorphic calcifications on the mammogram (OR 1.68, <italic>P</italic> = 0.009); 3) a mass suspicious for invasive carcinoma on ultrasonography and/or MRI (OR 2.13, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); 4) tumor size ≥2 cm on ultrasonography (OR 1.80, <italic>P</italic> = 0.032). HER2‐positive (OR 1.54, <italic>P</italic> = 0.062) and comedo necrosis (OR 1.42, <italic>P</italic> = 0.056) demonstrated a trend towards significance. A prediction model incorporating these variables demonstrated that the risk of upstaging was 5.1% with score 0–2 and was 58.1% with score 10.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso24037-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The prediction model incorporating clinicopathological features may be used to guide the selection of patients with DCIS for sentinel lymph node biopsy. <italic>J. Surg. Oncol. 2015; 112:476–480</italic>. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of surgical oncology. Volume 112:Issue 5(2015:Oct. 01)
- Journal:
- Journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 112:Issue 5(2015:Oct. 01)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 112, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0112-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 476
- Page End:
- 480
- Publication Date:
- 2015-09-08
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9098 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jso.24037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-4790
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5067.380000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4234.xml