Clinicians' practices regarding blind versus open weighing among patients with eating disorders. Issue 7 (12th December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Forbush, Kelsie T.; Richardson, Jonathan H.; Bohrer, Brittany K.
• Is Part Of: International journal of eating disorders. Volume 48:Issue 7(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 905
• Page End: 911
• Publication Date: 2014-12-12
• Subjects: Appetite disorders -- Periodicals; Ingestion disorders -- Periodicals; Eating disorders -- Periodicals; 616.8526
• DOI: 10.1002/eat.22369
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0276-3478

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="eat22369-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Empirically supported treatments for eating disorders, such as cognitive‐behavioral therapy and family‐based treatment, stress the importance of weighing patients during therapy and using this information as part of treatment. However, weighing practices vary widely across eating disorders professionals, including those that purport to provide empirically supported interventions.</p> </sec> <sec id="eat22369-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To characterize clinicians' practices regarding the decision to share (open weighing) or withhold (blind weighing) weight information with patients, a topic that has received limited prior attention.</p> </sec> <sec id="eat22369-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>Clinicians (<italic>N</italic> = 114; 85% female) who regularly treat individuals with an eating disorder completed an online survey to identify factors that might impact their decision to practice blind or open weighing.</p> </sec> <sec id="eat22369-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Approximately half of the clinicians reported generally using open weighing procedures (<italic>n</italic> = 53; 46.49%). Endorsement of cognitive‐behavioral or family‐based therapeutic orientation was not significantly associated with open weighing. However, clinicians who endorsed therapeutic modalities that do not specifically encourage open weighing were significantly more likely to engage in blind weighing. Clinicians working with clients with anorexia nervosa were significantly more likely to practice blind weighing, compared to clients with other eating disorder diagnoses, and cognitive or emotional impairment from malnutrition emerged as the strongest predictor of clinicians' decisions to practice blind weighing, controlling for all other variables.</p> </sec> <sec id="eat22369-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Discussion</title> <p>Development of specific training modules may be useful for improving adherence to empirically supported protocols that recommend open weighing. More importantly, however, our results highlight the need for future treatment studies to identify whether blind or open weighing is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:905–911)</p> </sec> </abstract>