Comparison of Needle Insertion and Guidewire Placement Techniques During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Needle Insertion and Guidewire Placement Techniques During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Needle Insertion and Guidewire Placement Techniques During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization
- Authors:
- Lee, Yong Hun
Kim, Tae Kyong
Jung, Yoo Sun
Cho, Youn Joung
Yoon, Susie
Seo, Jeong-Hwa
Jeon, Yunseok
Bahk, Jae Hyon
Hong, Deok Man - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>For needle insertion and guidewire placement during central venous catheterization, a thin-wall introducer needle technique and a cannula-over-needle technique have been used. This study compared these two techniques regarding the success rates and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Design:</title> <p>Prospective, randomized, controlled study.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Setting:</title> <p>A university-affiliated hospital.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Patients:</title> <p>Two hundred sixty-six patients scheduled for thoracic surgery, gynecologic surgery, or major abdominal surgery, who required central venous catheterization.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Interventions:</title> <p>Patients were randomly assigned to either the thin-wall introducer needle group (<italic>n</italic> = 134) or the cannula-over-needle group (<italic>n</italic> = 132). Central venous catheterization was performed on the right internal jugular vein under assistance with real-time ultrasonography. Needle insertion and guidewire placement were performed using a thin-wall introducer needle technique in the thin-wall introducer needle group and a cannula-over-needle technique in the cannula-over-needle group.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Measurements and Main Results:</title> <p>The guidewire placement on the first skin puncture was regarded as a successful guidewire<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>For needle insertion and guidewire placement during central venous catheterization, a thin-wall introducer needle technique and a cannula-over-needle technique have been used. This study compared these two techniques regarding the success rates and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Design:</title> <p>Prospective, randomized, controlled study.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Setting:</title> <p>A university-affiliated hospital.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Patients:</title> <p>Two hundred sixty-six patients scheduled for thoracic surgery, gynecologic surgery, or major abdominal surgery, who required central venous catheterization.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Interventions:</title> <p>Patients were randomly assigned to either the thin-wall introducer needle group (<italic>n</italic> = 134) or the cannula-over-needle group (<italic>n</italic> = 132). Central venous catheterization was performed on the right internal jugular vein under assistance with real-time ultrasonography. Needle insertion and guidewire placement were performed using a thin-wall introducer needle technique in the thin-wall introducer needle group and a cannula-over-needle technique in the cannula-over-needle group.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Measurements and Main Results:</title> <p>The guidewire placement on the first skin puncture was regarded as a successful guidewire insertion on the first attempt. The number of puncture attempts for internal jugular vein catheterization was recorded. Internal jugular vein was assessed by ultrasonography to identify complications. The rate of successful guidewire insertion on the first attempt was higher in the thin-wall introducer needle group compared with the cannula-over-needle group (87.3% vs 77.3%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.037). There were fewer puncture attempts in the thin-wall introducer needle group than in the cannula-over-needle group (1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.3 ± 0.6; <italic>p</italic> = 0.026). There was no significant difference in complications of internal jugular vein catheterization between the two groups.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>The thin-wall introducer needle technique showed a superior success rate for first attempt of needle and guidewire insertion and required fewer puncture attempts during internal jugular vein catheterization.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Critical care medicine. Volume 43:Issue 10(2015)
- Journal:
- Critical care medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Issue 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0043-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Critical care medicine -- Periodicals
Soins intensifs -- Périodiques
616.028 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001167 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0090-3493
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3487.451000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4063.xml