Impact of chemotherapy on survival in surgically resected retroperitoneal sarcoma. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of chemotherapy on survival in surgically resected retroperitoneal sarcoma. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of chemotherapy on survival in surgically resected retroperitoneal sarcoma
- Authors:
- Miura, J.T.
Charlson, J.
Gamblin, T.C.
Eastwood, D.
Banerjee, A.
Johnston, F.M.
Turaga, K.K. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">The role of systemic chemotherapy (CT) in the multimodality treatment strategy for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) remains controversial. We hypothesized that chemotherapy does not improve overall survival for patients with surgically resected RPS.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with RPS that underwent surgical resection from 1998 to 2011. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to assess overall survival (OS) and logistic regression was used for associations. Propensity score (PS) modeling was performed to create balanced cohorts for analysis.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">A total of 8653 patients with surgically resected RPS were identified; 1525 (17.6%) received CT; 10.6% of patients (n = 163) in the neoadjuvant setting. Factors associated with receipt of CT included moderate (OR 2.3) to poorly differentiated (OR 4.3) tumors, leiomyosarcoma (OR 1.8) or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (OR 2.3) histology, and R2 resection status (OR 2.2) (all <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Unadjusted median OS for patients receiving CT compared to surgery alone was 40 vs 68.2 months respectively (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01).<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">The role of systemic chemotherapy (CT) in the multimodality treatment strategy for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) remains controversial. We hypothesized that chemotherapy does not improve overall survival for patients with surgically resected RPS.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with RPS that underwent surgical resection from 1998 to 2011. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to assess overall survival (OS) and logistic regression was used for associations. Propensity score (PS) modeling was performed to create balanced cohorts for analysis.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">A total of 8653 patients with surgically resected RPS were identified; 1525 (17.6%) received CT; 10.6% of patients (n = 163) in the neoadjuvant setting. Factors associated with receipt of CT included moderate (OR 2.3) to poorly differentiated (OR 4.3) tumors, leiomyosarcoma (OR 1.8) or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (OR 2.3) histology, and R2 resection status (OR 2.2) (all <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Unadjusted median OS for patients receiving CT compared to surgery alone was 40 vs 68.2 months respectively (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). Following propensity score matching, worse median OS persisted among the CT cohort (40 vs 52 months, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002). Receipt of chemotherapy was not associated with improved long term survival in adjusted models for the raw and propensity matched cohorts (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04–1.31; <italic>p</italic> = 0.009).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">Current available chemotherapy regimens for RPS do not confer a survival benefit. Routine use of chemotherapy for RPS should be discouraged until new effective systemic agents become available.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 41:Issue 10(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 10(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1386
- Page End:
- 1392
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.014 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3974.xml