Bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, with or without cyclophosphamide, for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: 5‐year follow‐up. (7th July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, with or without cyclophosphamide, for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: 5‐year follow‐up. (7th July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, with or without cyclophosphamide, for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: 5‐year follow‐up
- Authors:
- Ludwig, Heinz
Greil, Richard
Masszi, Tamas
Spicka, Ivan
Shpilberg, Ofer
Hajek, Roman
Dmoszynska, Anna
Paiva, Bruno
Vidriales, María‐Belén
Esteves, Graca
Stoppa, Anne Marie
Robinson, Don
Chaturvedi, Shalini
Ataman, Ozlem
Enny, Christopher
Feng, Huaibao
van de Velde, Helgi
Viterbo, Luisa - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjh13582-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>This follow‐up extension of a randomised phase II study assessed differences in long‐term outcomes between bortezomib‐thalidomide‐dexamethasone (VTD) and VTD‐cyclophosphamide (VTDC) induction therapy in multiple myeloma. Newly diagnosed patients (<italic>n </italic>=<italic> </italic>98) were randomised 1:1 to intravenous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; days 1, 4, 8, 11), thalidomide (100 mg; days 1–21), and dexamethasone (40 mg; days 1–4, 9–12), with/without cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; days 1, 8), for four 21‐day cycles before stem‐cell mobilisation/transplantation. After a median follow‐up of 64·8 months, median time‐to‐next therapy was 51·8 and 47·9 months with VTD and VTDC, respectively. Type of subsequent therapy was similar in both arms. After adjusting for asymmetric censoring, median time to progression was not significantly different between VTD and VTDC [35·7 vs. 34·5 months; Hazard ratio (HR) 1·26, 95% confidence interval: 0·76–2·09; <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0·370]. Five‐year survival was 69·1% and 65·3% with VTD and VTDC, respectively. When analysed by minimal residual disease (MRD) status, overall survival was longer in MRD‐negative <italic>versus </italic>MRD‐positive patients with bone marrow‐confirmed complete response (HR 3·66, <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0·0318). VTD induction followed by transplantation provides long‐term disease control<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjh13582-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>This follow‐up extension of a randomised phase II study assessed differences in long‐term outcomes between bortezomib‐thalidomide‐dexamethasone (VTD) and VTD‐cyclophosphamide (VTDC) induction therapy in multiple myeloma. Newly diagnosed patients (<italic>n </italic>=<italic> </italic>98) were randomised 1:1 to intravenous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; days 1, 4, 8, 11), thalidomide (100 mg; days 1–21), and dexamethasone (40 mg; days 1–4, 9–12), with/without cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; days 1, 8), for four 21‐day cycles before stem‐cell mobilisation/transplantation. After a median follow‐up of 64·8 months, median time‐to‐next therapy was 51·8 and 47·9 months with VTD and VTDC, respectively. Type of subsequent therapy was similar in both arms. After adjusting for asymmetric censoring, median time to progression was not significantly different between VTD and VTDC [35·7 vs. 34·5 months; Hazard ratio (HR) 1·26, 95% confidence interval: 0·76–2·09; <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0·370]. Five‐year survival was 69·1% and 65·3% with VTD and VTDC, respectively. When analysed by minimal residual disease (MRD) status, overall survival was longer in MRD‐negative <italic>versus </italic>MRD‐positive patients with bone marrow‐confirmed complete response (HR 3·66, <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0·0318). VTD induction followed by transplantation provides long‐term disease control and, consistent with the primary analysis, there is no additional benefit from adding cyclophosphamide. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00531453).</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of haematology. Volume 171:Number 3(2015:Nov.)
- Journal:
- British journal of haematology
- Issue:
- Volume 171:Number 3(2015:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 171, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 171
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0171-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 344
- Page End:
- 354
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-07
- Subjects:
- Hematology -- Periodicals
Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.15 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blacksci.co.uk/%7Ecgilib/jnlpage.bin?Journal=bjh&File=bjh&Page=aims ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2141 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjh.13582 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1048
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2309.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3698.xml