Viability selection on female fly finery in the wild. (14th July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gwynne, Darryl T.; Punzalan, David; Hunt, John
• Is Part Of: Biological journal of the Linnean Society. Volume 116:Number 3(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 530
• Page End: 540
• Publication Date: 2015-07-14
• Subjects: Biology -- Periodicals; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; 570
• DOI: 10.1111/bij.12606
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0024-4066

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bij12606-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Female ornaments have evolved in a few taxa in which females compete for access to important resources provided by their mates. However, the effects of these sexually selected traits on survival have not been studied. Elaborate leg‐scale and/or abdominal ornaments are displayed by females of some <italic>Rhamphomyia</italic> dance flies (Diptera: Empididae) to flying males carrying prey gifts (females do not hunt). Previous analyses have shown significant sexual selection on these female traits. We studied viability selection on the traits by sampling the webs of two spider species and comparing prey <italic>R. longicauda</italic> females to survivors. We also investigated viability selection from one of the spiders over two seasons. We found that the direction of viability selection on <italic>R. longicauda</italic> from sticky <italic>Tetragnatha</italic> spider webs was consistent over two seasons. For abdominal ornaments the form of viability selection was positive and primarily directional (linear). Viability selection also favoured shorter tibiae but there was no significant selection on the size of residual tibial scale area. However, with the addition of dance fly kills from the non‐sticky, leaf‐covering webs of a <italic>Dictyna</italic> spider, abundant in only one of the seasons, the overall direction of viability selection favoured larger tibial ornaments. While noting that this viability selection on tibial scale ornaments may be a statistical artefact of the fewer traits in the two‐predator analysis (abdominal structures were missing from most <italic>Dictyna</italic> prey), we suggest that simple differences in the natural history of selective agents causing mortality may partly explain the variation in whether sexual traits are under viability selection. Viability selection on ornamental traits may vary greatly between seasons with changes in the abundances of different natural enemies so that net directional selection on these traits over many generations may be weak.</p> </abstract>