A multivariate approach to assess variation in tooth mineralization using free‐lived and captive‐raised chimpanzees (P. troglodytes). Issue 3 (16th July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boughner, Julia C.; Der, Jasmine; Kuykendall, Kevin L.
• Is Part Of: American journal of physical anthropology. Volume 158:Issue 3(2015)
• Page Start: 452
• Page End: 462
• Publication Date: 2015-07-16
• Subjects: Physical anthropology -- Periodicals; Anthropology -- Periodicals; Anthropologie physique -- Périodiques; 599.9
• DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22800
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9483

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="ajpa22800-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>Understanding variation in dental development among primates is important to accurately characterize species‐specific sequences and times of tooth formation. Conventional approaches that summarize dental development data (i.e., dental maturity score, DMS) inherently omit information about the full range of variation in raw scores; thus, classic bivariate analyses are limited for exploring patterns of variation in detail. Here we report a new multivariate approach to simultaneously assess all raw dental scores, for all teeth, among all individuals for all groups, thus retaining much greater detail about population‐specific patterns of variation.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajpa22800-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We scored (0–12) permanent tooth mineralization using radiographs of mandibles of captive‐raised known‐age chimpanzees (<italic>Pan troglodytes; n</italic> = 114) and free‐lived age‐unknown conspecifics (<italic>n</italic> = 54). As a test of our method we also scored free‐lived baboons (<italic>Papio anubis</italic>, <italic>n</italic> = 50) because of well‐described contrasting patterns of permanent molar initiation between <italic>Papio</italic> and <italic>Pan</italic>. Using principal component analysis (PCA), we investigated how crypt, crown and root formation scores covaried with each other in all three genera, and with chronological age in captive chimpanzees.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajpa22800-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>PCA successfully captured additional detail about variation among raw scores. Also, compared to DMS, PC1 scores correlated equivalently well with known ages but had lower prediction error.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajpa22800-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>We found different patterns of variation in scores between younger juvenile free and captive chimpanzees but saw no wholesale differences between groups. <italic>Pan</italic> and <italic>Papio</italic> showed different patterns of variation, further validating this multivariate approach to visualize, quantify and compare raw dental score datasets among primate species. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:452–462, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>