Genome‐wide analyses suggest parallel selection for universal traits may eclipse local environmental selection in a highly mobile carnivore. Issue 19 (22nd September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stronen, Astrid Vik; Jędrzejewska, Bogumiła; Pertoldi, Cino; Demontis, Ditte; Randi, Ettore; Niedziałkowska, Magdalena; Borowik, Tomasz; Sidorovich, Vadim E.; Kusak, Josip; Kojola, Ilpo; Karamanlidis, Alexandros A.; Ozolins, Janis; Dumenko, Vitalii; Czarnomska, Sylwia D.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 5:Issue 19(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 4410
• Page End: 4425
• Publication Date: 2015-09-22
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1695
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ece31695-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Ecological and environmental heterogeneity can produce genetic differentiation in highly mobile species. Accordingly, local adaptation may be expected across comparatively short distances in the presence of marked environmental gradients. Within the European continent, wolves (<italic>Canis lupus</italic>) exhibit distinct north–south population differentiation. We investigated more than 67‐K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci for signatures of local adaptation in 59 unrelated wolves from four previously identified population clusters (northcentral Europe <italic>n</italic> = 32, Carpathian Mountains <italic>n</italic> = 7, Dinaric‐Balkan <italic>n</italic> = 9, Ukrainian Steppe <italic>n</italic> = 11). Our analyses combined identification of outlier loci with findings from genome‐wide association study of individual genomic profiles and 12 environmental variables. We identified 353 candidate SNP loci. We examined the SNP position and neighboring megabase (1 Mb, one million bases) regions in the dog (<italic>C. lupus familiaris</italic>) genome for genes potentially under selection, including homologue genes in other vertebrates. These regions included functional genes for, for example, temperature regulation that may indicate local adaptation and genes controlling for functions universally important for wolves, including olfaction, hearing, vision, and cognitive functions. We also observed strong outliers not associated with any of the investigated variables, which could suggest selective pressures associated with other unmeasured environmental variables and/or demographic factors. These patterns are further supported by the examination of spatial distributions of the SNPs associated with universally important traits, which typically show marked differences in allele frequencies among population clusters. Accordingly, parallel selection for features important to all wolves may eclipse local environmental selection and implies long‐term separation among population clusters.</p> </abstract>