Abdominal Paracentesis Drainage Does Not Increase Infection in Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Issue 9 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Abdominal Paracentesis Drainage Does Not Increase Infection in Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Issue 9 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Abdominal Paracentesis Drainage Does Not Increase Infection in Severe Acute Pancreatitis
- Authors:
- Liu, Liye
Yan, Hongtao
Liu, Weihui
Cui, Jianfeng
Wang, Tao
Dai, Ruiwu
Liang, Hongyin
Luo, Hao
Tang, Lijun - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Goals:</title> <p>To demonstrate the relationship between abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) and infectious complications in moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) or severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>The effectiveness of APD for SAP was demonstrated in our previous study. However, the relationship between APD and infectious complications has not been fully elucidated.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Study:</title> <p>We conducted a prospective cohort study of 255 patients with MSAP or SAP. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent APD (group 1) and patients with acute pancreatitis who did not undergo APD (group 2). Four types of infectious complications were evaluated: bacteremia, infected necrosis, pneumonia, and sepsis. The pathogens responsible for infectious complications were analyzed. The need for percutaneous catheter drainage and mortality were also compared between the 2 groups.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>A total of 255 patients were included with analogous baseline features. The rate of overall infectious complications in group 1 was 38.1%, which was lower than that in group 2 (52.7%, <italic>P</italic>=0.019). This difference was mainly based on infected necrosis (12.7% and 23.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, <italic>P</italic>=0.034). The microbial spectrum was<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Goals:</title> <p>To demonstrate the relationship between abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) and infectious complications in moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) or severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>The effectiveness of APD for SAP was demonstrated in our previous study. However, the relationship between APD and infectious complications has not been fully elucidated.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Study:</title> <p>We conducted a prospective cohort study of 255 patients with MSAP or SAP. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent APD (group 1) and patients with acute pancreatitis who did not undergo APD (group 2). Four types of infectious complications were evaluated: bacteremia, infected necrosis, pneumonia, and sepsis. The pathogens responsible for infectious complications were analyzed. The need for percutaneous catheter drainage and mortality were also compared between the 2 groups.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>A total of 255 patients were included with analogous baseline features. The rate of overall infectious complications in group 1 was 38.1%, which was lower than that in group 2 (52.7%, <italic>P</italic>=0.019). This difference was mainly based on infected necrosis (12.7% and 23.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, <italic>P</italic>=0.034). The microbial spectrum was similar in the 2 groups. Percutaneous catheter drainage was used less frequent in group 1 (18.3%) than in group 2 (31.8%, <italic>P</italic>=0.014). The infection-related mortality in groups 1 and 2 was 6.5% and 8.5%, respectively, and there was no significant difference (<italic>P</italic>=0.457).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>Our results indicate that APD did not increase the infectious complications and infection-related mortality compared with the strategy without APD in patients with MSAP or SAP.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical gastroenterology. Volume 49:Issue 9(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 9(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 9 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0049-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases
Gastroenterology
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.33005 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jcge/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jcge.com ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00004836-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000358 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0192-0790
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.470000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4355.xml