Intrapartum mean platelet volume is not a useful predictor of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia. Issue 1 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Intrapartum mean platelet volume is not a useful predictor of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia. Issue 1 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Intrapartum mean platelet volume is not a useful predictor of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia
- Authors:
- Vilchez, Gustavo
Londra, Laura
Hoyos, Luis R.
Sokol, Robert
Bahado-Singh, Ray - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0005">To determine whether intrapartum mean platelet volume (MPV) can predict new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In a retrospective study, data were obtained for women with delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (≥ 48 hours after delivery) who attended the Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA, between January 2002 and July 2010. Patients were divided into two subgroups: new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (no history of hypertensive disorder before 48 hours after delivery) and other late-onset/delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (history of hypertensive disorders). Cases with no hypertensive disorders paired by delivery date were selected as controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine whether MPV could distinguish between cases and controls.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Data for 130 cases of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia, 71 cases of other late-onset/delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia, and 405 controls were collected. MPV was significantly different between the pre-eclampsia subgroups (<italic>P</italic> = 0.007). ROC curves showed that MPV significantly distinguished new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia cases (area under the curve 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5–0.6;<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0005">To determine whether intrapartum mean platelet volume (MPV) can predict new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In a retrospective study, data were obtained for women with delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (≥ 48 hours after delivery) who attended the Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA, between January 2002 and July 2010. Patients were divided into two subgroups: new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (no history of hypertensive disorder before 48 hours after delivery) and other late-onset/delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia (history of hypertensive disorders). Cases with no hypertensive disorders paired by delivery date were selected as controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine whether MPV could distinguish between cases and controls.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Data for 130 cases of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia, 71 cases of other late-onset/delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia, and 405 controls were collected. MPV was significantly different between the pre-eclampsia subgroups (<italic>P</italic> = 0.007). ROC curves showed that MPV significantly distinguished new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia cases (area under the curve 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5–0.6; <italic>P</italic> = 0.02), with a sensitivity and specificity of 58.1% and 55.4%, respectively.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0025">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0020">Although MPV was significantly lower in women who went on to develop new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia than among controls, it is not a useful predictor. The low MPV suggests a different mechanism for the development of new-onset delayed postpartum pre-eclampsia.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 131:Issue 1(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics
- Issue:
- Volume 131:Issue 1(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0131-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 59
- Page End:
- 62
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00207292 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207292 ↗
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18793479 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0020-7292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3099.xml