Assessment and care for non-medical risk factors in current antenatal health care. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment and care for non-medical risk factors in current antenatal health care. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Assessment and care for non-medical risk factors in current antenatal health care
- Authors:
- Vos, Amber A.
Leeman, Annemiek
Waelput, Adja J.M.
Bonsel, Gouke J.
Steegers, Eric A.P.
Denktaş, Semiha - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sect0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0050">this study aims to identify current practice in risk assessment, current antenatal policy and referral possibilities for non-medical risk factors (lifestyle and social risk factors), and to explore the satisfaction among obstetric caregivers in their collaboration with non-obstetrical caregivers.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0015">Design</title> <p id="sp0055">cross-sectional study</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0020">Setting</title> <p id="sp0060">Dutch antenatal care system</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0025">Participants</title> <p id="sp0065">community midwives from 139 midwifery practices and gynaecologists, hospital-based midwives, and trainees in obstetrics from 38 hospitals.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0030">Measurements and findings</title> <p id="sp0070">results were analysed with <italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> tests and unpaired <italic>t</italic>-tests. Caregivers universally screened upon lifestyle risk factors (e.g. smoking or drug use), whereas the screening for social risk factors (e.g. social support) was highly variable. As national guidelines are absent, local protocols were reported to be used for screening on non-medical risk factors in more than 40%. Caregivers stated multidisciplinary protocols to be a prerequisite for assessment of non-medical risk factors. Only 22% of the caregivers used predefined<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sect0010">Objective</title> <p id="sp0050">this study aims to identify current practice in risk assessment, current antenatal policy and referral possibilities for non-medical risk factors (lifestyle and social risk factors), and to explore the satisfaction among obstetric caregivers in their collaboration with non-obstetrical caregivers.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0015">Design</title> <p id="sp0055">cross-sectional study</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0020">Setting</title> <p id="sp0060">Dutch antenatal care system</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0025">Participants</title> <p id="sp0065">community midwives from 139 midwifery practices and gynaecologists, hospital-based midwives, and trainees in obstetrics from 38 hospitals.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0030">Measurements and findings</title> <p id="sp0070">results were analysed with <italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> tests and unpaired <italic>t</italic>-tests. Caregivers universally screened upon lifestyle risk factors (e.g. smoking or drug use), whereas the screening for social risk factors (e.g. social support) was highly variable. As national guidelines are absent, local protocols were reported to be used for screening on non-medical risk factors in more than 40%. Caregivers stated multidisciplinary protocols to be a prerequisite for assessment of non-medical risk factors. Only 22% of the caregivers used predefined criteria to define when patients should be discussed multidisciplinary.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sect0035">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0075">despite their relevance, non-medical risk factors remain an underexposed topic in antenatal risk factor screening in both the community and hospital-based care setting. <italic>Implications for practice</italic> Structural antenatal risk assessment for non-medical risk factors with subsequent consultation opportunities is advocated, preferably based on a multidisciplinary guideline.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Midwifery. Volume 31:Issue 10(2015)
- Journal:
- Midwifery
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0031-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 979
- Page End:
- 985
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Midwifery -- Periodicals
Midwifery -- Periodicals
Sages-femmes -- Périodiques
Midwifery
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02666138 ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/midw/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/midw/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0266-6138;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0266-6138
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5761.449220
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3334.xml