A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions. Issue 11 (25th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamamoto, Yusuke; Tahara, Haruna; Usami, Ryota; Kasahara, Toshihiko; Jimbo, Yoshihiro; Hioki, Takanori; Fujita, Masaharu
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied toxicology. Volume 35:Issue 11(2015)
• Page Start: 1348
• Page End: 1360
• Publication Date: 2015-03-25
• Subjects: Toxicology -- Periodicals; Industrial toxicology -- Periodicals; Environmentally induced diseases -- Periodicals; Toxicology -- Periodicals; 615.9005
• DOI: 10.1002/jat.3139
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0260-437X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is a simple and versatile alternative method for the evaluation of skin sensitization that involves the reaction of test chemicals with two peptides. However, this method requires concentrated solutions of test chemicals, and hydrophobic substances may not dissolve at the concentrations required. Furthermore, hydrophobic test chemicals may precipitate when added to the reaction solution. We previously established a high‐sensitivity method, the amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). This method uses novel cysteine (NAC) and novel lysine derivatives (NAL), which were synthesized by introducing a naphthalene ring to the amine group of cysteine and lysine residues. In this study, we modified the ADRA method by reducing the concentration of the test chemicals 100‐fold. We investigated the accuracy of skin sensitization predictions made using the modified method, which was designated the ADRA‐dilutional method (ADRA‐DM). The predictive accuracy of the ADRA‐DM for skin sensitization was 90% for 82 test chemicals which were also evaluated via the ADRA, and the predictive accuracy in the ADRA‐DM was higher than that in the ADRA and DPRA. Furthermore, no precipitation of test compounds was observed at the initiation of the ADRA‐DM reaction. These results show that the ADRA‐DM allowed the use of test chemicals at concentrations two orders of magnitude lower than that possible with the ADRA. In addition, ADRA‐DM does not have the restrictions on test compound solubility that were a major problem with the DPRA. Therefore, the ADRA‐DM is a versatile and useful method. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>