Evaluating distributional shifts in home range estimates. Issue 18 (24th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clapp, Justin G.; Beck, Jeffrey L.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 5:Issue 18(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 3869
• Page End: 3878
• Publication Date: 2015-08-24
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1655
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ece31655-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A variety of methods are commonly used to quantify animal home ranges using location data acquired with telemetry. High‐volume location data from global positioning system (GPS) technology provide researchers the opportunity to identify various intensities of use within home ranges, typically quantified through utilization distributions (UDs). However, the wide range of variability evident within UDs constructed with modern home range estimators is often overlooked or ignored during home range comparisons, and challenges may arise when summarizing distributional shifts among multiple UDs. We describe an approach to gain additional insight into home range changes by comparing UDs across isopleths and summarizing comparisons into meaningful results. To demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, we used GPS location data from 16 bighorn sheep (<italic>Ovis canadensis</italic>) to identify distributional changes before and after habitat alterations, and we discuss advantages in its application when comparing home range size, overlap, and joint‐space use. We found a consistent increase in bighorn sheep home range size when measured across home range levels, but that home range overlap and similarity values decreased when examined at increasing core levels. Our results highlight the benefit of conducting multiscale assessments when comparing distributions, and we encourage researchers to expand comparative home range analyses to gain a more comprehensive evaluation of distributional changes and to evaluate comparisons across home range levels.</p> </abstract>