Relationship between serum response factor and androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Issue 15 (7th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prencipe, Maria; O'Neill, Amanda; O'Hurley, Gillian; Nguyen, Lan K.; Fabre, Aurelie; Bjartell, Anders; Gallagher, William M.; Morrissey, Colm; Kay, Elaine W.; Watson, R. William
• Is Part Of: Prostate. Volume 75:Issue 15(2015)
• Page Start: 1704
• Page End: 1717
• Publication Date: 2015-08-07
• Subjects: Prostate -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/pros.23051
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0270-4137

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="pros23051-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Serum response factor (SRF) is an important transcription factor in castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Since CRPC is associated with androgen receptor (AR) hypersensitivity, we investigated the relationship between SRF and AR.</p> </sec> <sec id="pros23051-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title> <p>Transcriptional activity was assessed by luciferase assay. Cell proliferation was measured by MTT and flow cytometry. Protein expression in patients was assessed by immunohistochemistry.</p> </sec> <sec id="pros23051-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>To investigate AR involvement in SRF response to androgen, AR expression was down‐regulated using siRNA. This resulted in the abrogation of SRF induction post‐DHT. Moreover, DHT stimulation failed to induce SRF transcriptional activity in AR‐negative PC346 DCC cells, which was only restored following AR over‐expression. Next, SRF expression was down‐regulated by siRNA, resulting in AR increased transcriptional activity in castrate‐resistant LNCaP Abl cells but not in the parental LNCaP. This negative feedback loop in the resistant cells was confirmed by immunohistochemistry which showed a negative correlation between AR and SRF expression in CRPC bone metastases and a positive correlation in androgen‐naïve prostatectomies. Cell proliferation was next assessed following SRF inhibition, demonstrating that SRF inhibition is more effective than AR inhibition in castrate‐resistant cells.</p> </sec> <sec id="pros23051-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> <p>Our data support SRF as a promising therapeutic target in combination with current treatments. <italic>Prostate 75:1704–1717, 2015</italic>. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>