Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with integrated fixation and adjunctive posterior stabilization: A comparative biomechanical analysis. Issue 8 (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yeager, Matthew S.; Dupre, Derrick A.; Cook, Daniel J.; Oh, Michael Y.; Altman, Daniel T.; Cheng, Boyle C.
• Is Part Of: Clinical biomechanics. Volume 30:Issue 8(2015)
• Page Start: 769
• Page End: 774
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Osteopathic medicine -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Osteopathic Medicine -- Periodicals; 612.76
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.06.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-0033

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">Interbody fusion cages with integrated fixation components have become of interest due to their ability to provide enhanced post-operative stability and mitigate device migration. A recently approved anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated fixation anchors has yet to be compared <italic>in vitro</italic> to a standard polyetheretherketone cage when used in combination with an interspinous process clamp.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Methods</title> <p id="sp0010">Twelve human cadaveric lumbar segments were implanted at L4–L5 with a Solus interbody cage (n = 6) or standard polyetheretherketone cage (n = 6) following Intact testing and discectomy. Each cage was subsequently evaluated in all primary modes of loading after supplementation with the following posterior constructs: interspinous process clamp, bilateral transfacet screws, unilateral transfacet screw with contralateral pedicle screws, and bilateral pedicle screws. Range of motion results were normalized to Intact, and a two-way mixed analysis of variance was utilized to detect statistical differences.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Findings</title> <p id="sp0015">The Solus cage in combination with all posterior constructs provided significant fixation compared to Intact in all loading conditions. The polyetheretherketone cage also provided significant fixation when combined with all screw based treatments, however when used with the interspinous process clamp a significant reduction was not observed in lateral bending or axial torsion.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0025">Interpretation</title> <p id="sp0020">Interbody cages with integrated fixation components enhance post-operative stability within the intervertebral space, thus affording clinicians the potential to utilize less invasive methods of posterior stabilization when seeking circumferential fusion. Interspinous process clamps, in particular, may reduce peri-operative and post-operative comorbidities compared to screw based constructs. Further study is necessary to corroborate their effectiveness <italic>in vivo</italic>.</p> </sec> </abstract>