Lower vitamin D status in obese compared with normal-weight women despite higher vitamin D intake in early pregnancy. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lower vitamin D status in obese compared with normal-weight women despite higher vitamin D intake in early pregnancy. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Lower vitamin D status in obese compared with normal-weight women despite higher vitamin D intake in early pregnancy
- Authors:
- Karlsson, Therese
Andersson, Louise
Hussain, Aysha
Bosaeus, Marja
Jansson, Nina
Osmancevic, Amra
Hulthén, Lena
Holmäng, Agneta
Larsson, Ingrid - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Obesity is associated with lower vitamin D concentrations than normal-weight. Pregnancy may affect vitamin D status, especially in obese subjects.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0015">The purpose of this study was to compare vitamin D status and intake between obese and normal-weight women during pregnancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0020">Twenty-five obese and 80 normal-weight women were recruited in the Western Sweden region (latitude 57°N). Blood samples and information on diet and sun exposure were collected in each trimester during pregnancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Results</title> <p id="abspara0025">During summer months, 12% of normal-weight and 50% of obese women in the first trimester had serum 25(OH)D concentrations &lt;50 nmol/L (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01). Supplement use, body fat mass, season of blood sampling, and travelling to southern latitudes were the most important determinants of vitamin D status. Obese women had higher reported dietary vitamin D intake in early pregnancy compared with normal-weight women. Usage of supplements containing vitamin D was 61% in early pregnancy and declined thereafter. Nine percent of normal-weight and 33% of obese women (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01)<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Obesity is associated with lower vitamin D concentrations than normal-weight. Pregnancy may affect vitamin D status, especially in obese subjects.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0015">The purpose of this study was to compare vitamin D status and intake between obese and normal-weight women during pregnancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0020">Twenty-five obese and 80 normal-weight women were recruited in the Western Sweden region (latitude 57°N). Blood samples and information on diet and sun exposure were collected in each trimester during pregnancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Results</title> <p id="abspara0025">During summer months, 12% of normal-weight and 50% of obese women in the first trimester had serum 25(OH)D concentrations &lt;50 nmol/L (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01). Supplement use, body fat mass, season of blood sampling, and travelling to southern latitudes were the most important determinants of vitamin D status. Obese women had higher reported dietary vitamin D intake in early pregnancy compared with normal-weight women. Usage of supplements containing vitamin D was 61% in early pregnancy and declined thereafter. Nine percent of normal-weight and 33% of obese women (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01) reported a dietary vitamin D intake according to national recommendations in the beginning of pregnancy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0035">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0030">Half of the obese women had what could be considered as suboptimal vitamin D status in early pregnancy and lower vitamin D status compared with normal-weight women despite reporting a higher dietary vitamin D intake. A majority of the women did not reach intake of vitamin D according to dietary recommendations.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical nutrition. Volume 34:Issue 5(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Clinical nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Issue 5(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0034-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 892
- Page End:
- 898
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Critically ill -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Diet therapy -- Periodicals
Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Parenteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Periodicals
Diétothérapie -- Périodiques
Alimentation parentérale -- Périodiques
Alimentation entérale -- Périodiques
Nutrition -- Périodiques
Diet therapy
Enteral feeding
Nutrition
Parenteral feeding
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
615.854 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02615614 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.09.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0261-5614
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.314500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3046.xml