Comparison of different definitions of feeding intolerance: A retrospective observational study. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of different definitions of feeding intolerance: A retrospective observational study. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of different definitions of feeding intolerance: A retrospective observational study
- Authors:
- Reintam Blaser, Annika
Starkopf, Liis
Deane, Adam M.
Poeze, Martijn
Starkopf, Joel - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background &amp; aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">While feeding intolerance (FI) is clinically important in the critically ill it is inconsistently defined. By evaluating definitions of FI based on relationships between symptoms and signs of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and mortality the objective was to define FI using the definition that was most strongly associated with subsequent mortality.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Data from all adult patients admitted to a single ICU between 2004 and 2011, and who were receiving enteral nutrition (EN), were analysed. The amount of EN administered, presence of absent bowel sounds (BS), vomiting and/or regurgitation, diarrhoea, bowel distension, and large gastric residual volumes (GRVs) were documented daily. A GRV ≥500 ml/day was considered as large and the sum of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including large GRV was calculated daily. Various definitions of FI were modelled. Definitions using only GRV, or GRV with other GI symptoms, or GRV and failure to reach preset EN targets were evaluated. The predictive power of FI on mortality was tested by adding the presence of FI (different definitions were tested one-by-one) into multiple regression analyses together with admission day demographic and severity of illness variables.</p> </sec> <sec> <title<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background &amp; aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">While feeding intolerance (FI) is clinically important in the critically ill it is inconsistently defined. By evaluating definitions of FI based on relationships between symptoms and signs of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and mortality the objective was to define FI using the definition that was most strongly associated with subsequent mortality.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Data from all adult patients admitted to a single ICU between 2004 and 2011, and who were receiving enteral nutrition (EN), were analysed. The amount of EN administered, presence of absent bowel sounds (BS), vomiting and/or regurgitation, diarrhoea, bowel distension, and large gastric residual volumes (GRVs) were documented daily. A GRV ≥500 ml/day was considered as large and the sum of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including large GRV was calculated daily. Various definitions of FI were modelled. Definitions using only GRV, or GRV with other GI symptoms, or GRV and failure to reach preset EN targets were evaluated. The predictive power of FI on mortality was tested by adding the presence of FI (different definitions were tested one-by-one) into multiple regression analyses together with admission day demographic and severity of illness variables.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">Of the 1712 patients included, 221 (12.9%) died in ICU and 495 (28.9%) had died within 90 days after ICU admission. The definition of FI based on the presence of at least three out of five GI symptoms was most strongly related to ICU-mortality (6.3% prevalence in survivors vs. 23.5% in non-survivors, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, odds ratio (95%CI) 3.39 (2.23–5.14)), whereas EN &lt;23% of caloric target was the strongest predictor for mortality 90 days after admission (50.7% prevalence among survivors vs 75.2% in non-survivors, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, odds ratio (95% CI) 2.34 (1.80–3.04)).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0025">FI is associated with increased mortality but the strength of this relationship depends on the definition used. The 'best' definition of FI for prediction of ICU-mortality is based on a complex assessment of GI symptoms (including large GRV), whereas enteral underfeeding is the definition of FI that is the strongest predictor of death within 90 days of admission. Our 'best' definitions are not immediately generalizable, but should help building up future studies.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical nutrition. Volume 34:Issue 5(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Clinical nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Issue 5(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0034-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 956
- Page End:
- 961
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Critically ill -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Diet therapy -- Periodicals
Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Parenteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Periodicals
Diétothérapie -- Périodiques
Alimentation parentérale -- Périodiques
Alimentation entérale -- Périodiques
Nutrition -- Périodiques
Diet therapy
Enteral feeding
Nutrition
Parenteral feeding
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
615.854 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02615614 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.10.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0261-5614
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.314500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3045.xml