Regularised Manova for High‐Dimensional Data. (6th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ullah, Insha; Jones, Beatrix
• Is Part Of: Australian & New Zealand journal of statistics. Volume 57:Number 3(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 377
• Page End: 389
• Publication Date: 2015-08-06
• Subjects: Statistics -- Periodicals; 519.5
• DOI: 10.1111/anzs.12126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-1473

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="anzs12126-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>The traditional and readily available multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) tests such as Wilks' Lambda and the Pillai–Bartlett trace start to suffer from low power as the number of variables approaches the sample size. Moreover, when the number of variables exceeds the number of available observations, these statistics are not available for use. Ridge regularisation of the covariance matrix has been proposed to allow the use of MANOVA in high‐dimensional situations and to increase its power when the sample size approaches the number of variables. In this paper two forms of ridge regression are compared to each other and to a novel approach based on lasso regularisation, as well as to more traditional approaches based on principal components and the Moore‐Penrose generalised inverse. The performance of the different methods is explored via an extensive simulation study. All the regularised methods perform well; the best method varies across the different scenarios, with margins of victory being relatively modest. We examine a data set of soil compaction profiles at various positions relative to a ridgetop, and illustrate how our results can be used to inform the selection of a regularisation method.</p> </abstract>