When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. (5th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Waal‐Andrews, Wendy; Gregg, Aiden P.; Lammers, Joris
• Is Part Of: British journal of social psychology. Volume 54:Part 3(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 445
• Page End: 464
• Publication Date: 2014-11-05
• Subjects: Social psychology -- Periodicals; 302.05
• DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12093
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-6665

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjso12093-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>What type of behaviour affords status, agentic, or communal? Research to date has yielded inconsistent answers. In particular, the <italic>conflict view</italic> holds that agentic behaviour permits the imperious to grab status through overt force, whereas the <italic>functional view</italic> holds that communal behaviour permits the talented to earn status through popular appeal. Here, we synthesize both views by taking into account the moderating role played by group hierarchy. Group hierarchy can range from being dominance based (where status is grabbed) to prestige based (where status is granted). In a field study (Study 1), and a laboratory experiment (Study 2), we demonstrate that in different groups, status can be achieved in different ways. Specifically, agentic behaviour promotes status regardless of hierarchy type, whereas the effect of communal behaviour on status is moderated by hierarchy type: it augments it in more prestige‐based hierarchies but diminishes it in more dominance‐based hierarchies.</p> </abstract>