Small cell‐ versus large cell‐sized metal stent in endoscopic bilateral stent‐in‐stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Issue 6 (24th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Small cell‐ versus large cell‐sized metal stent in endoscopic bilateral stent‐in‐stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Issue 6 (24th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Small cell‐ versus large cell‐sized metal stent in endoscopic bilateral stent‐in‐stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction
- Authors:
- Lee, Jae Min
Lee, Sang Hyub
Chung, Kwang Hyun
Park, Jin Myung
Paik, Woo Hyun
Woo, Sang Myung
Lee, Woo Jin
Ryu, Ji Kon
Kim, Yong‐Tae - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den12466-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background and Aim</title> <p>Although the large cell‐sized biliary stent facilitates contralateral stent deployment through the mesh of the first metallic stent for stent‐in‐stent (SIS) technique, there are concerns about its vulnerability to tumor ingrowth. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic bilateral SIS placement according to the cell size of a self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS).</p> </sec> <sec id="den12466-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A total of 58 patients were enrolled who underwent endoscopic bilateral SIS placement of SEMS for malignant hilar biliary obstruction as a result of cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Finally, 43 patients who underwent successful stent insertion were included in the analysis and divided into the small cell‐sized stent (SCS; <italic>n</italic> = 21) and the large cell‐sized stent (LCS; <italic>n</italic> = 22) groups. We retrospectively compared comprehensive clinical and laboratory data in both groups.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12466-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were no significant differences between the two groups in successful drainage (SCS <italic>vs</italic> LCS, 100% <italic>vs</italic> 100%, respectively), early complications (38.1% <italic>vs</italic> 18.2%), late complications<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den12466-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background and Aim</title> <p>Although the large cell‐sized biliary stent facilitates contralateral stent deployment through the mesh of the first metallic stent for stent‐in‐stent (SIS) technique, there are concerns about its vulnerability to tumor ingrowth. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic bilateral SIS placement according to the cell size of a self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS).</p> </sec> <sec id="den12466-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A total of 58 patients were enrolled who underwent endoscopic bilateral SIS placement of SEMS for malignant hilar biliary obstruction as a result of cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Finally, 43 patients who underwent successful stent insertion were included in the analysis and divided into the small cell‐sized stent (SCS; <italic>n</italic> = 21) and the large cell‐sized stent (LCS; <italic>n</italic> = 22) groups. We retrospectively compared comprehensive clinical and laboratory data in both groups.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12466-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were no significant differences between the two groups in successful drainage (SCS <italic>vs</italic> LCS, 100% <italic>vs</italic> 100%, respectively), early complications (38.1% <italic>vs</italic> 18.2%), late complications (14.3% <italic>vs</italic> 22.7%), stent occlusion (42.9% <italic>vs</italic> 45.5%), tumor ingrowth (33.3% <italic>vs</italic> 45.5%) or overgrowth (9.5% <italic>vs</italic> 0%). Duration of stent patency and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (<italic>P</italic> = 0.086 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.320, respectively).</p> </sec> <sec id="den12466-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Endoscopic bilateral SIS placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction shows no differences in stent patency, survival, complications and clinical course according to the cell size of SEMS.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Digestive endoscopy. Volume 27:Issue 6(2015)
- Journal:
- Digestive endoscopy
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Issue 6(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0027-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 692
- Page End:
- 699
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-24
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- diagnosis -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
616.3 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/den.12466 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0915-5635
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3588.346200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2977.xml