Genetic basis of tristyly in tetraploid Oxalis alpina (Oxalidaceae). (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weller, Stephen G.; Sakai, Ann K.; Lucas, Cathryn A.; Weber, Jennifer J.; Domínguez, César A.; Molina‐Freaner, Francisco E.
• Is Part Of: Botanical journal of the Linnean Society. Volume 179:Number 2(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 308
• Page End: 318
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Botany -- Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.1111/boj.12316
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0024-4074

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>The inheritance of style‐morphs was investigated in tetraploid populations of tristylous <italic>O</italic><italic>xalis alpina</italic> (Oxalidaceae) to determine if alleles controlling style‐morphs are expressed at duplicated loci. In tetraploid populations, a dominant <italic>S</italic> allele leads to expression of the short‐styled phenotype at the short/non‐short locus and is epistatic to the <italic>M</italic> allele at the mid/long locus. The <italic>M</italic> allele results in expression of the mid‐styled phenotype but only if the <italic>S</italic> allele is absent. Long‐styled morphs are homozygous recessive at the short and mid loci. Test crosses of many tetraploid short‐styled individuals resulted in segregations of short‐, mid‐ and long‐styled individuals which, because of linkage between the short and mid loci, can only occur with polyploidy and expression of alleles at duplicated loci. Segregation patterns from three crosses suggest the possibility of disomic inheritance via preferential pairing of chromosomes in tetraploid populations of <italic>O</italic><italic>. alpina</italic>. Segregation patterns in the progeny of mid‐styled individuals indicated that only a few individuals had more than one copy of the <italic>M</italic> allele, despite the potential for accumulation of <italic>M</italic> alleles via self‐fertilization of partially self‐compatible mid‐styled morphs in some populations. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, <italic>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</italic>, 2015, <bold>179</bold>, 308–318.</p> </abstract>