British Orthodontic Society national audit of temporary anchorage devices (TADs): report of the first thousand TADs placed. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bearn, David R.; Alharbi, Fahad
• Is Part Of: Journal of orthodontics. Volume 42:Number 3(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 214
• Page End: 219
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Orthodontics -- Periodicals; 617.643005
• DOI: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000010
• Languages: German
• ISSNs: 1465-3125

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To provide data from the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) national clinical audit on temporary anchorage device (TAD) use following the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NIHCE)</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Design and setting:</title> <p>The Audit commenced on 1 January 2008 and is still ongoing. This article reports the data for TADs placed from 1 January 2008 to 1 November 2013.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Materials and methods:</title> <p>Audit data was collected from participants using a system of both on-line data entry and hard copy forms. The criteria and standards for the audit were set following the NIHCE report in conjunction with the Development and Standards Committee of the BOS. Virtually all participants used the on-line data entry available on the BOS website. The data submitted was checked and entered manually into an Excel spreadsheet, and transferred to SPSS for analysis.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Written information and documented discussion of risks were provided in over 90% of TADs placed, but 17.4% were placed without a specific signed consent form. Temporary anchorage device failure rate was 24.2% overall. Among failed TADs, 93.1% were lost or removed due to excess mobility. Infection or inflammation resulting in loss or removal was reported in 6% of TADs.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>The only audit standard that was met was failures due to infection of inflammation. The rest of the audit standards were not met. Recommendations are made to address these issues.</p> </sec> </abstract>