Rawlsian Justice and Palliative Care. (17th February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Knight, Carl; Albertsen, Andreas
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 29:Number 8(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 536
• Page End: 542
• Publication Date: 2015-02-17
• Subjects: Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Palliative care serves both as an integrated part of treatment and as a last effort to care for those we cannot cure. The extent to which palliative care should be provided and our reasons for doing so have been curiously overlooked in the debate about distributive justice in health and healthcare. We argue that one prominent approach, the Rawlsian approach developed by Norman Daniels, is unable to provide such reasons and such care. This is because of a central feature in Daniels' account, namely that care should be provided to restore people's opportunities. Daniels' view is both unable to provide pain relief to those who need it as a supplement to treatment and, without justice‐based reasons to provide palliative care to those whose opportunities cannot be restored. We conclude that this makes Daniels' framework much less attractive.</p> </abstract>