Patient-Level Discordance in Population Percentiles of the Total Cholesterol to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Comparison With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. Issue 8 (25th August 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient-Level Discordance in Population Percentiles of the Total Cholesterol to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Comparison With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. Issue 8 (25th August 2015)
- Main Title:
- Patient-Level Discordance in Population Percentiles of the Total Cholesterol to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Comparison With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
- Authors:
- Elshazly, Mohamed B.
Quispe, Renato
Michos, Erin D.
Sniderman, Allan D.
Toth, Peter P.
Banach, Maciej
Kulkarni, Krishnaji R.
Coresh, Josef
Blumenthal, Roger S.
Jones, Steven R.
Martin, Seth S. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background—</title> <p>The total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) ratio, estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non–HDL-C are routinely available from the standard lipid profile. We aimed to assess the extent of patient-level discordance of TC/HDL-C with LDL-C and non–HDL-C, because discordance suggests the possibility of additional information.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods and Results—</title> <p>We compared population percentiles of TC/HDL-C, Friedewald-estimated LDL-C, and non–HDL-C in 1 310 432 US adults from the Very Large Database of Lipids. Lipid testing was performed by ultracentrifugation (Vertical Auto Profile, Atherotech, AL). One in 3 patients had ≥25 percentile units discordance between TC/HDL-C and LDL-C, whereas 1 in 4 had ≥25 percentile units discordance between TC/HDL-C and non–HDL-C. The proportion of patients with TC/HDL-C &gt; LDL-C by ≥25 percentile units increased from 3% at triglycerides &lt;100 mg/dL to 51% at triglycerides 200 to 399 mg/dL. On a smaller scale, TC/HDL-C &gt; non–HDL-C discordance by ≥25 percentile units increased from 6% to 21%. In those with &lt;15th percentile levels of LDL-C (&lt;70 mg/dL) or non–HDL-C (&lt;93 mg/dL), a respective 58% and 46% were above the percentile-equivalent TC/HDL-C of 2.6. Age, sex, and directly measured components of the standard lipid profile explained &gt;86% of the variance in<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background—</title> <p>The total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) ratio, estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non–HDL-C are routinely available from the standard lipid profile. We aimed to assess the extent of patient-level discordance of TC/HDL-C with LDL-C and non–HDL-C, because discordance suggests the possibility of additional information.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods and Results—</title> <p>We compared population percentiles of TC/HDL-C, Friedewald-estimated LDL-C, and non–HDL-C in 1 310 432 US adults from the Very Large Database of Lipids. Lipid testing was performed by ultracentrifugation (Vertical Auto Profile, Atherotech, AL). One in 3 patients had ≥25 percentile units discordance between TC/HDL-C and LDL-C, whereas 1 in 4 had ≥25 percentile units discordance between TC/HDL-C and non–HDL-C. The proportion of patients with TC/HDL-C &gt; LDL-C by ≥25 percentile units increased from 3% at triglycerides &lt;100 mg/dL to 51% at triglycerides 200 to 399 mg/dL. On a smaller scale, TC/HDL-C &gt; non–HDL-C discordance by ≥25 percentile units increased from 6% to 21%. In those with &lt;15th percentile levels of LDL-C (&lt;70 mg/dL) or non–HDL-C (&lt;93 mg/dL), a respective 58% and 46% were above the percentile-equivalent TC/HDL-C of 2.6. Age, sex, and directly measured components of the standard lipid profile explained &gt;86% of the variance in percentile discordance between TC/HDL-C versus LDL-C and non–HDL-C.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions—</title> <p>In this contemporary, cross-sectional, big data analysis of US adults who underwent advanced lipid testing, the extent of patient-level discordance suggests that TC/HDL-C may offer potential additional information to LDL-C and non–HDL-C. Future studies are required to determine the clinical implications of this observation.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Clinical Trial Registration—</title> <p>URL: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</ext-link>. Unique identifier: NCT01698489.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Circulation. Volume 132:Issue 8(2015)
- Journal:
- Circulation
- Issue:
- Volume 132:Issue 8(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 132, Issue 8 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 132
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0132-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-08-25
- Subjects:
- Blood -- Circulation -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Blood Circulation
Cardiovascular System
Vascular Diseases
616.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.4.2a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=HFFJFPCLPODDKOLGNCALDCMCIACKAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.1384_1326796138_84.1384_1326796138_96.1384_1326796138_97%7c66%7c50 ↗
http://www.circulationaha.org ↗
http://circ.ahajournals.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016163 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-7322
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3265.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4207.xml