In vivo comparison of hard tissue regeneration with ovine mesenchymal stem cells processed with either the FICOLL method or the BMAC method. Issue 7 (September 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- In vivo comparison of hard tissue regeneration with ovine mesenchymal stem cells processed with either the FICOLL method or the BMAC method. Issue 7 (September 2015)
- Main Title:
- In vivo comparison of hard tissue regeneration with ovine mesenchymal stem cells processed with either the FICOLL method or the BMAC method
- Authors:
- Ardjomandi, N.
Duttenhoefer, F.
Xavier, S.
Oshima, T.
Kuenz, A.
Sauerbier, S. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Introduction</title> <p id="abspara0010">The aim of this work was to analyse the suitability of mesenchymal stem cell isolation by FICOLL density centrifugation and the closed bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) system for sinus augmentation with bovine bone mineral (BBM) in the sheep model.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">16 sheep underwent sinus augmentation with BBM and MSCs; they were divided between two groups with survival points of 8 and 16 weeks. For the FICOLL control arm three, and for the BMAC test arm, five augmentations were performed for each time point. The derived cell numbers were counted; a colony forming unit (CFU) assay was performed; the pluripotency of the MSCs was proved; histological and histomorphometrical analysis were performed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">The approach of using BBM and MSCs in combination with fibrin adhesive was sufficient for new bone formation as the FICOLL experiment indicated. However, due to significantly lower cell numbers isolated using the BMAC in sheep, less new bone was formed in the test arm.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0025">The BMAC system is well suited for human MSC isolation but it needs to be optimized to fit sheep cell characteristics<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Introduction</title> <p id="abspara0010">The aim of this work was to analyse the suitability of mesenchymal stem cell isolation by FICOLL density centrifugation and the closed bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) system for sinus augmentation with bovine bone mineral (BBM) in the sheep model.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">16 sheep underwent sinus augmentation with BBM and MSCs; they were divided between two groups with survival points of 8 and 16 weeks. For the FICOLL control arm three, and for the BMAC test arm, five augmentations were performed for each time point. The derived cell numbers were counted; a colony forming unit (CFU) assay was performed; the pluripotency of the MSCs was proved; histological and histomorphometrical analysis were performed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">The approach of using BBM and MSCs in combination with fibrin adhesive was sufficient for new bone formation as the FICOLL experiment indicated. However, due to significantly lower cell numbers isolated using the BMAC in sheep, less new bone was formed in the test arm.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0025">The BMAC system is well suited for human MSC isolation but it needs to be optimized to fit sheep cell characteristics if it is to be used in this animal model.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Volume 43:Issue 7(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Issue 7(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 7 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0043-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 1177
- Page End:
- 1183
- Publication Date:
- 2015-09
- Subjects:
- Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- surgery -- Periodicals
Skull -- surgery -- Periodicals
Oral Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Surgery, Oral -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
617.514 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10105182 ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/10105182 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1010-5182
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4965.482000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4149.xml