Hybrid Versus Conventional Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. Issue 9 (22nd July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Hybrid Versus Conventional Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. Issue 9 (22nd July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Hybrid Versus Conventional Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
- Authors:
- Settepani, Fabrizio
Cappai, Antioco
Basciu, Alessio
Barbone, Alessandro
Citterio, Enrico
Ornaghi, Diego
Tarelli, Giuseppe - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>To determine whether the hybrid approach to acute type A aortic dissection results in improved outcomes in terms of mortality, neurologic complications, need for distal aortic reintervention, and false lumen thrombosis compared with the conventional approach.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Data from comparative studies of hybrid versus conventional treatment of acute type A aortic dissection were combined through meta‐analysis. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Seven comparative studies including 967 patients were identified; of these, 503 underwent conventional proximal aortic repair and 429 extensive distal aortic repair including a stented elephant trunk technique. Between the two groups there was no significant difference in operative mortality (p = 0.96), permanent neurologic deficit (p = 0.95), and late mortality (p = 0.59). Distal aortic repair showed a higher rate of false lumen thrombosis of the thoracic aorta (odd ratio 11.16; p &lt; 0.001) and a reduced risk of distal reintervention (odd ratio 0.37; p = 0.01). In sub‐group analysis, frozen elephant trunk procedure showed a lower rate of distal aortic reintervention and a higher rate of false lumen<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>To determine whether the hybrid approach to acute type A aortic dissection results in improved outcomes in terms of mortality, neurologic complications, need for distal aortic reintervention, and false lumen thrombosis compared with the conventional approach.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Data from comparative studies of hybrid versus conventional treatment of acute type A aortic dissection were combined through meta‐analysis. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Seven comparative studies including 967 patients were identified; of these, 503 underwent conventional proximal aortic repair and 429 extensive distal aortic repair including a stented elephant trunk technique. Between the two groups there was no significant difference in operative mortality (p = 0.96), permanent neurologic deficit (p = 0.95), and late mortality (p = 0.59). Distal aortic repair showed a higher rate of false lumen thrombosis of the thoracic aorta (odd ratio 11.16; p &lt; 0.001) and a reduced risk of distal reintervention (odd ratio 0.37; p = 0.01). In sub‐group analysis, frozen elephant trunk procedure showed a lower rate of distal aortic reintervention and a higher rate of false lumen thrombosis than antegrade/retrograde stent deployment techniques (p = 0.008 and &lt;0.001, respectively).</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12598-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Distal aortic repair may reduce the risk of distal reintervention and increase the rate of false lumen thrombosis without significant increase in operative mortality and permanent neurologic deficit; however, no benefit with respect to late mortality was found. The frozen elephant trunk may reduce the risk of distal aortic reintervention and may increase the false lumen thrombosis of the thoracic aorta in comparison with antegrade/retrograde stent deployment procedures. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12598 <italic>(J Card Surg 2015;30:707–713)</italic></p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiac surgery. Volume 30:Issue 9(2015:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiac surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Issue 9(2015:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 9 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0030-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 707
- Page End:
- 713
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-22
- Subjects:
- Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.412005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-8191 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=jcs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jocs.12598 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-0440
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.863500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3045.xml