Coupling and quantifying resilience and sustainability in facilities management. Issue 4 (7th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cox, Rimante Andrasiunaite; Nielsen, Susanne Balslev; Rode, Carsten
• Is Part Of: Journal of facilities management. Volume 13:Issue 4(2015)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 331
• Publication Date: 2015-09-07
• Subjects: Facility management -- Periodicals; 658.2005
• DOI: 10.1108/JFM-04-2015-0012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-5967

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – The purpose of this paper is to consider how to couple and quantify resilience and sustainability, where sustainability refers to not only environmental impact, but also economic and social impacts. The way a particular function of a building is provisioned may have significant repercussions beyond just resilience. The goal is to develop a decision support tool for facilities managers. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – A risk framework is used to quantify both resilience and sustainability in monetary terms. The risk framework allows to couple resilience and sustainability, so that the provisioning of a particular building can be investigated with consideration of functional, environmental, economic and, possibly, social dimensions. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – The method of coupling and quantifying resilience and sustainability (CQRS) is illustrated with a simple example that highlights how very different conclusions can be drawn when considering only resilience or resilience and sustainability. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</title> <p> – The paper is based on a hypothetical example. The example also illustrates the difficulty in deriving the costs and probabilities associated with particular indicators. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Practical implications</title> <p> – The method is generic, allowing the method to be customized for different user communities. Further research is needed to translate this theoretical framework to a practical tool for practitioners and to evaluate the CQRS method in practice. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – The intention of this research is to fill the gap between the need for increasing sustainability and resilience of the built environment and the current practices in property maintenance and operation.</p> </sec> </abstract>