Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria: Identification of Features to Classify Gout. Issue 9 (September 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria: Identification of Features to Classify Gout. Issue 9 (September 2015)
- Main Title:
- Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria: Identification of Features to Classify Gout
- Authors:
- Taylor, William J.
Fransen, Jaap
Jansen, Tim L.
Dalbeth, Nicola
Schumacher, H. Ralph
Brown, Melanie
Louthrenoo, Worawit
Vazquez‐Mellado, Janitzia
Eliseev, Maxim
McCarthy, Geraldine
Stamp, Lisa K.
Perez‐Ruiz, Fernando
Sivera, Francisca
Ea, Hang‐Korng
Gerritsen, Martijn
Scire, Carlo
Cavagna, Lorenzo
Lin, Chingtsai
Chou, Yin‐Yi
Tausche, Anne Kathrin
Vargas‐Santos, Ana Beatriz
Janssen, Matthijs
Chen, Jiunn‐Horng
Slot, Ole
Cimmino, Marco A.
Uhlig, Till
Neogi, Tuhina - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine which clinical, laboratory, and imaging features most accurately distinguished gout from non‐gout.</p> </sec> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We performed a cross‐sectional study of consecutive rheumatology clinic patients with ≥1 swollen joint or subcutaneous tophus. Gout was defined by synovial fluid or tophus aspirate microscopy by certified examiners in all patients. The sample was randomly divided into a model development (two‐thirds) and test sample (one‐third). Univariate and multivariate association between clinical features and monosodium urate–defined gout was determined using logistic regression modeling. Shrinkage of regression weights was performed to prevent overfitting of the final model. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify patterns of joint involvement.</p> </sec> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In total, 983 patients were included. Gout was present in 509 (52%). In the development sample (n = 653), the following features were selected for the final model: joint erythema (multivariate odds ratio [OR] 2.13), difficulty walking (multivariate OR 7.34), time to maximal pain &lt;24 hours (multivariate OR 1.32), resolution by 2 weeks (multivariate OR 3.58), tophus (multivariate OR 7.29), first<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine which clinical, laboratory, and imaging features most accurately distinguished gout from non‐gout.</p> </sec> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We performed a cross‐sectional study of consecutive rheumatology clinic patients with ≥1 swollen joint or subcutaneous tophus. Gout was defined by synovial fluid or tophus aspirate microscopy by certified examiners in all patients. The sample was randomly divided into a model development (two‐thirds) and test sample (one‐third). Univariate and multivariate association between clinical features and monosodium urate–defined gout was determined using logistic regression modeling. Shrinkage of regression weights was performed to prevent overfitting of the final model. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify patterns of joint involvement.</p> </sec> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In total, 983 patients were included. Gout was present in 509 (52%). In the development sample (n = 653), the following features were selected for the final model: joint erythema (multivariate odds ratio [OR] 2.13), difficulty walking (multivariate OR 7.34), time to maximal pain &lt;24 hours (multivariate OR 1.32), resolution by 2 weeks (multivariate OR 3.58), tophus (multivariate OR 7.29), first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint ever involved (multivariate OR 2.30), location of currently tender joints in other foot/ankle (multivariate OR 2.28) or MTP1 joint (multivariate OR 2.82), serum urate level &gt;6 mg/dl (0.36 mmoles/liter; multivariate OR 3.35), ultrasound double contour sign (multivariate OR 7.23), and radiograph erosion or cyst (multivariate OR 2.49). The final model performed adequately in the test set, with no evidence of misfit, high discrimination, and predictive ability. MTP1 joint involvement was the most common joint pattern (39.4%) in gout cases.</p> </sec> <sec id="acr22585-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Ten key discriminating features have been identified for further evaluation for new gout classification criteria. Ultrasound findings and degree of uricemia add discriminating value, and will significantly contribute to more accurate classification criteria.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Arthritis care & research. Volume 67:Issue 9(2015:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Arthritis care & research
- Issue:
- Volume 67:Issue 9(2015:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 67, Issue 9 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0067-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1304
- Page End:
- 1315
- Publication Date:
- 2015-09
- Subjects:
- Arthritis -- Periodicals
Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123227259/grouphome/home.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/acr.22585 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2151-464X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2996.xml