A head-to-head comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) in an older acute medical population. (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A head-to-head comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) in an older acute medical population. (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- A head-to-head comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) in an older acute medical population
- Authors:
- de Morton, Natalie A.
Nolan, Jo
O'Brien, Michael
Thomas, Susie
Govier, Adam
Sherwell, Karen
Harris, Bruce
Markham, Noel - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Purpose</italic>: To compare the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI®) and the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS). <italic>Method</italic>: A head-to-head comparison of the EMS and DEMMI® with 120 consecutive older acute medical patients. The DEMMI® and EMS were administered within 48 h of hospital admission and discharge. <italic>Results</italic>: At admission, 6% and 15% of participants scored the lowest scale score for the DEMMI® and EMS, respectively. For the DEMMI®, 17% of participants scored within the minimal detectable change of the lowest scale score compared to 20% for the EMS at admission. At hospital discharge, DEMMI® scores were normally distributed and the EMS had a ceiling effect. Similar evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity were obtained for the DEMMI® and EMS. There was no significant difference in responsiveness to change between the DEMMI® and EMS. The EMS was significantly quicker to administer compared to the DEMMI®. <italic>Conclusion</italic>: The DEMMI® and EMS are both valid measures of mobility for older acute medical patients. The DEMMI® has a broader scale width than the EMS with interval level measurement and therefore provides a more accurate method for measuring and monitoring changes in mobility for older acute medical patients.<list list-type="bullet"><title>Implications for Rehabilitation</title><list-item><p>Mobility of older acute medical<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Purpose</italic>: To compare the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI®) and the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS). <italic>Method</italic>: A head-to-head comparison of the EMS and DEMMI® with 120 consecutive older acute medical patients. The DEMMI® and EMS were administered within 48 h of hospital admission and discharge. <italic>Results</italic>: At admission, 6% and 15% of participants scored the lowest scale score for the DEMMI® and EMS, respectively. For the DEMMI®, 17% of participants scored within the minimal detectable change of the lowest scale score compared to 20% for the EMS at admission. At hospital discharge, DEMMI® scores were normally distributed and the EMS had a ceiling effect. Similar evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity were obtained for the DEMMI® and EMS. There was no significant difference in responsiveness to change between the DEMMI® and EMS. The EMS was significantly quicker to administer compared to the DEMMI®. <italic>Conclusion</italic>: The DEMMI® and EMS are both valid measures of mobility for older acute medical patients. The DEMMI® has a broader scale width than the EMS with interval level measurement and therefore provides a more accurate method for measuring and monitoring changes in mobility for older acute medical patients.<list list-type="bullet"><title>Implications for Rehabilitation</title><list-item><p>Mobility of older acute medical patients.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Hospitalised older acute medical patients are at "high risk" of mobility decline.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Accurate measurement of mobility is essential for preventing and treating mobility decline.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Many existing mobility measures have significant measurement limitations.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The DEMMI® is a more accurate measure of mobility than the EMS in an older acute medical population.</p></list-item></list></p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Disability and rehabilitation. Volume 37:Number 20(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Disability and rehabilitation
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Number 20(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 20 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 20
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0037-0020-0000
- Page Start:
- 1881
- Page End:
- 1887
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- People with disabilities -- Periodicals
Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
617.03 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/idre20 ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/dre ↗
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09638288.asp ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0963-8288
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3595.420300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4154.xml