Clinical response of edentulous people treated with mini dental implants in nine dental practices. (17th July 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical response of edentulous people treated with mini dental implants in nine dental practices. (17th July 2013)
- Main Title:
- Clinical response of edentulous people treated with mini dental implants in nine dental practices
- Authors:
- Mundt, Torsten
Schwahn, Christian
Stark, Thomas
Biffar, Reiner - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="ger12066-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To analyse implant survival, prosthetic aftercare and quality of life (QoL) after stabilisation of complete dentures with mini‐implants.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Many edentulous patients refuse implant therapy due to the expenses and fear of surgery. Studies on minimally invasive and low‐cost mini‐implants remain rare.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>A total of 133 participating patients from nine private practices were evaluated via patient records, questionnaires and clinical examinations. Complications, maintenance, QoL questions and the German short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP‐G14) were analysed.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>After 7 to 61 months, 15 of 336 maxillary implants and 11 of 402 mandibular implants had to be removed. In addition, four mandibular implants experienced fracture. The difference between the 4‐year survival rates of 94.3% for the maxilla and 95.7% for the mandible was not statistically significant (<italic>p </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.581). All original 144 overdentures remained functional. The prosthetic interventions were typically limited to repairs of acrylic<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ger12066-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To analyse implant survival, prosthetic aftercare and quality of life (QoL) after stabilisation of complete dentures with mini‐implants.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Many edentulous patients refuse implant therapy due to the expenses and fear of surgery. Studies on minimally invasive and low‐cost mini‐implants remain rare.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>A total of 133 participating patients from nine private practices were evaluated via patient records, questionnaires and clinical examinations. Complications, maintenance, QoL questions and the German short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP‐G14) were analysed.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>After 7 to 61 months, 15 of 336 maxillary implants and 11 of 402 mandibular implants had to be removed. In addition, four mandibular implants experienced fracture. The difference between the 4‐year survival rates of 94.3% for the maxilla and 95.7% for the mandible was not statistically significant (<italic>p </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.581). All original 144 overdentures remained functional. The prosthetic interventions were typically limited to repairs of acrylic base fractures (about one in five patients), changes of plastic O‐rings and relining procedures. The participants showed OHIP‐G14 scores (median = 2) that were comparable with those of patients with overdentures retained by conventional implants.</p> </sec> <sec id="ger12066-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Mini‐implant survival was similar to that of regular‐diameter implants. Although some prosthetic aftercare was necessary, none of the overdentures had to be replaced. Prospective studies comparing conventional and mini‐implants are warranted.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gerodontology. Volume 32:Number 3(2015:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Gerodontology
- Issue:
- Volume 32:Number 3(2015:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0032-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 179
- Page End:
- 187
- Publication Date:
- 2013-07-17
- Subjects:
- Older people -- Dental care -- Periodicals
617.60846 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=ger ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ger.12066 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0734-0664
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4162.179500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3381.xml