Racial Differences in False-positive Mammogram Rates. Issue 8 (August 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Racial Differences in False-positive Mammogram Rates. Issue 8 (August 2015)
- Main Title:
- Racial Differences in False-positive Mammogram Rates
- Authors:
- McCarthy, Anne Marie
Yamartino, Philip
Yang, Jianing
Bristol, Mirar
Conant, Emily F.
Armstrong, Katrina - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality, but false-positive tests are common. Few studies have assessed racial differences in false-positive rates.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>We compared false-positive mammography rates for black and white women, and the effect of patient and facility characteristics on false positives.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Research Design and Subjects:</title> <p>A prospective cohort study. From a sample of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), we identified black/African American (N=3176) or white (N=26, 446) women with no prior breast surgery or breast cancer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Measures:</title> <p>Race, demographics, and breast cancer risk factors were self-reported. Results of initial digital and film mammograms were assessed. False positives were defined as a positive mammogram (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0, 4, 5) with no cancer diagnosis within 15 months.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>The false-positive rate for digital mammograms was 9.2% for black women compared with 7.8% for white women (<italic>P</italic>=0.009). After adjusting for age, black women had 17% increased odds of false-positive digital mammogram compared with whites (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35; <italic>P</italic>=0.033). This<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality, but false-positive tests are common. Few studies have assessed racial differences in false-positive rates.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>We compared false-positive mammography rates for black and white women, and the effect of patient and facility characteristics on false positives.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Research Design and Subjects:</title> <p>A prospective cohort study. From a sample of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), we identified black/African American (N=3176) or white (N=26, 446) women with no prior breast surgery or breast cancer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Measures:</title> <p>Race, demographics, and breast cancer risk factors were self-reported. Results of initial digital and film mammograms were assessed. False positives were defined as a positive mammogram (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0, 4, 5) with no cancer diagnosis within 15 months.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>The false-positive rate for digital mammograms was 9.2% for black women compared with 7.8% for white women (<italic>P</italic>=0.009). After adjusting for age, black women had 17% increased odds of false-positive digital mammogram compared with whites (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35; <italic>P</italic>=0.033). This association was attenuated after adjusting for patient factors, prior films, and study site (OR=1.04; 95% CI, 0.91–1.20; <italic>P</italic>=0.561). There was no difference in the occurrence of false positives by race for film mammography.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>Black women had higher frequency of false-positive digital mammograms explained by lack of prior films and study site.The variation in the disparity between the established technique (film) and the new technology (digital) raises the possibility that racial differences in screening quality may be greatest for new technologies.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical care. Volume 53:Issue 8(2015)
- Journal:
- Medical care
- Issue:
- Volume 53:Issue 8(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 53, Issue 8 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0053-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-08
- Subjects:
- Economics, Medical -- Periodicals
Insurance, Health -- Periodicals
Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques
Soins médicaux -- Périodiques
Medical economics -- Periodicals
Health insurance -- Periodicals
Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals
Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals
Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals
Personal Health Services -- Periodicals
Gezondheidszorg
Économie de la santé -- Périodiques
Santé, Services de -- Périodiques
Health insurance
Medical economics
United States
Periodicals
362.10973 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.5.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=KMNBFPPHIIDDBOCKNCALGCGCMHAHAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.269_1327399138_15.269_1327399138_27.269_1327399138_28%7c285%7c50 ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/00257079.html ↗
http://www.lww-medicalcare.com ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/00257079.html ↗
http://www.lww-medicalcare.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000393 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-7079
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5526.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3292.xml