Impact of retropharyngeal adenopathy on distant control and survival in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Issue 1 (July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of retropharyngeal adenopathy on distant control and survival in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Issue 1 (July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of retropharyngeal adenopathy on distant control and survival in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy
- Authors:
- Samuels, Stuart E.
Vainshtein, Jeffrey
Spector, Matthew E.
Ibrahim, Mohannad
McHugh, Jonathan B.
Tao, Yebin
Schipper, Matthew
Worden, Francis
Eisbruch, Avraham - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">Retropharyngeal adenopathy (RPA) is poor prognostic factor in head and neck (HN) cancer. However, the prognostic significance of RPA in Human Papillomavirus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is unknown.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Patients and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">185 patients with HPV + OPC were assessed. Pre-therapy images reviewed by a HN radiologist to determine presence of RPA. Doses to the RPAs were determined from treatment plans. Outcomes analyzed using Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests, and correlations determined using Spearman's rank analyses.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">29 (16%) of the HPV + patients had RPA. At median follow-up 49 months, 5-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS) and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were 57% vs. 81% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.02), 63% vs 80% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.015) and 70% vs 91% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.002) for patients with/without RPA, respectively. No differences observed in local/ regional control rates, exceeding 90% in both groups, and No RPA recurrences were observed. In multivariable analysis, stages T4 or N3, and RPA, were independently, statistically significantly associated with both OS and distant failure, while N2c, age, disease site, and smoking status, were not.</p> </sec> <sec><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">Retropharyngeal adenopathy (RPA) is poor prognostic factor in head and neck (HN) cancer. However, the prognostic significance of RPA in Human Papillomavirus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is unknown.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Patients and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">185 patients with HPV + OPC were assessed. Pre-therapy images reviewed by a HN radiologist to determine presence of RPA. Doses to the RPAs were determined from treatment plans. Outcomes analyzed using Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests, and correlations determined using Spearman's rank analyses.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">29 (16%) of the HPV + patients had RPA. At median follow-up 49 months, 5-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS) and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were 57% vs. 81% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.02), 63% vs 80% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.015) and 70% vs 91% (<italic>P</italic> = 0.002) for patients with/without RPA, respectively. No differences observed in local/ regional control rates, exceeding 90% in both groups, and No RPA recurrences were observed. In multivariable analysis, stages T4 or N3, and RPA, were independently, statistically significantly associated with both OS and distant failure, while N2c, age, disease site, and smoking status, were not.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st025">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0020">RPA in HPV + OPC is an independent prognostic factor for distant failure, translating into worse OS. Patients with RPA may not be suitable candidates for trials of systemic treatment de-escalation.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 116:Issue 1(2015:Jul.)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 116:Issue 1(2015:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 116, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 116
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0116-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 75
- Page End:
- 81
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3602.xml