Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two‐dimensional spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging (SE‐EPI) and three‐dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness. Issue 3 (24th December 2014) - Low, Gavin
Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of MRE using a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging (SE‐EPI) renal MRE technique in healthy volunteers. Methods Institutional review board approved prospective study in which all participants provided written informed consent. Sixteen healthy volunteers comprising seven males and nine females with a median age of 35 years (age range: 23 to 59 years) were included. Coronal 90 Hz and 60 Hz MRE acquisitions were performed twice within a 30‐min interval between examinations. Renal MRE reliability was assessed by (i) test–retest repeatability, and (ii) inter‐rater agreement between two independent readers. The MRE‐measured averaged renal stiffness values were evaluated using: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland‐Altman and the within‐subject coefficient of variation (COV). Results For test–retest repeatability, Bland‐Altman showed a mean stiffness difference between examinations of 0.07 kPa (95% limits of agreement: −1.41, 1.54) at 90 Hz and 0.01 kPa (95% limits of agreement: −0.51, 0.53) at 60 Hz. Coefficient of repeatability was 1.47 kPa and 0.52 kPa at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. The within‐subject COV was 13.6% and 7.7% at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. ICC values were 0.922 and 0.907 for test–retest repeatability and 0.998 and 0.989 for inter‐rater agreement, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion SE‐EPI renal MRE is a reliable technique. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:844–850.