Agronomic factors in the establishment of tetraploid seeded Miscanthus × giganteus. Issue 5 (7th June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Eric K.; Lee, DoKyoung; Allen, Damian J.; Voigt, Thomas B.
• Is Part Of: Global change biology. Volume 7:Issue 5(2015)
• Page Start: 1075
• Page End: 1083
• Publication Date: 2014-06-07
• Subjects: Biomass energy -- Periodicals; Biomass energy -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Energy crops -- Periodicals; 662.88
• DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12192
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-1693

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="gcbb12192-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>To meet US renewable fuel mandates, perennial grasses have been identified as important potential feedstocks for processing into biofuels. Triploid <italic>Miscanthus</italic> ×<italic> giganteus</italic>, a sterile, rhizomatous grass, has proven to be a high‐yielding biomass crop over the past few decades in the European Union and, more recently, in the United States. However, high establishment costs from rhizomes are a limitation to more widespread plantings without government subsidies. A recently developed tetraploid cultivar of <italic>M</italic>. ×<italic> giganteus</italic> producing viable seeds (seeded miscanthus) shows promise in producing high yields with reduced establishment costs. Field experiments were conducted in Urbana, Illinois from 2011 to 2013 to optimize seeded miscanthus establishment by comparing seeding rates (10, 20, and 40 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>) and planting methods (drilling seeds at 38 and 76 cm row spacing vs. hydroseeding with and without premoistened seeds) under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Drought conditions in 2011 and 2012 coincided with stand establishment failure under rainfed conditions, suggesting that seeded miscanthus may not establish well in water‐stressed environments. In irrigated plots, hydroseeding without premoistening was significantly better than hydroseeding with premoistening, drilling at 38 cm and drilling at 76 cm with respect to plant number (18%, 54%, and 59% higher, respectively), plant frequency (13%, 30%, and 40% better, respectively), and the rate of canopy closure (18%, 33%, and 43% faster, respectively) when averaged across seeding rates. However, differences in second‐year biomass yields among treatments were less pronounced, as plant size partially compensated for plant density. Both hydroseeding and drilling at rates of 20 or 40 seeds m<sup>−2</sup> appear to be viable planting options for establishing seeded miscanthus provided sufficient soil moisture, but additional strategies are required for this new biomass production system under rainfed conditions.</p> </abstract>