Healthcare-Associated Pathogens and Nursing Home Policies and Practices: Results From a National Survey. (23rd March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Healthcare-Associated Pathogens and Nursing Home Policies and Practices: Results From a National Survey. (23rd March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Healthcare-Associated Pathogens and Nursing Home Policies and Practices: Results From a National Survey
- Authors:
- Ye, Zhiqiu
Mukamel, Dana B.
Huang, Susan S.
Li, Yue
Temkin-Greener, Helena - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="abs1" sec-type="general"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To examine the prevalence of healthcare-associated pathogens and the infection control policies and practices in a national sample of nursing homes (NHs).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs2" sec-type="methods"> <title>METHODS</title> <p>In 2012, we conducted a national survey about the extent to which NHs follow suggested infection control practices with regard to 3 common healthcare-associated pathogens: methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic>, and extended-spectrum <italic>β</italic>-lactamase producers, and their prevalence in NHs. We adapted a previously used and validated NH infection control survey, including questions on prevalence, admission and screening policies, contact precautions, decolonization, and cleaning practices.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs3" sec-type="results"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>A total of 1, 002 surveys were returned. Of the responding NHs, 14.2% were less likely to accept residents with methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, with the principal reason being lack of single or cohort rooms. NHs do not routinely perform admission screening (96.4%) because it is not required by regulation (56.2%) and would not change care provision (30.7%). Isolation strategies vary substantially, with gloves being most<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="abs1" sec-type="general"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To examine the prevalence of healthcare-associated pathogens and the infection control policies and practices in a national sample of nursing homes (NHs).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs2" sec-type="methods"> <title>METHODS</title> <p>In 2012, we conducted a national survey about the extent to which NHs follow suggested infection control practices with regard to 3 common healthcare-associated pathogens: methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic>, and extended-spectrum <italic>β</italic>-lactamase producers, and their prevalence in NHs. We adapted a previously used and validated NH infection control survey, including questions on prevalence, admission and screening policies, contact precautions, decolonization, and cleaning practices.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs3" sec-type="results"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>A total of 1, 002 surveys were returned. Of the responding NHs, 14.2% were less likely to accept residents with methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, with the principal reason being lack of single or cohort rooms. NHs do not routinely perform admission screening (96.4%) because it is not required by regulation (56.2%) and would not change care provision (30.7%). Isolation strategies vary substantially, with gloves being most commonly used. Most NHs (75.1%) do not decolonize carriers of methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, but some (10.6%) decolonize more than 90% of residents. Despite no guidance on how resident rooms on contact precautions should be cleaned, 59.3% of NHs report enhanced cleaning for such rooms.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs4" sec-type="conclusion"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> <p>Overall, NHs tend to follow voluntary infection control guidelines only if doing so does not require substantial financial investment in new or dedicated staff or infrastructure.</p> <p> <italic>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</italic> 2015;36(7):759–766</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 36:Number 7(2015)
- Journal:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Number 7(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 7 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0036-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 759
- Page End:
- 766
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-23
- Subjects:
- Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Cross Infection -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Hospitals -- Periodicals
Infection Control -- Periodicals
614.44 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00004848-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ICE ↗
http://www.ichejournal.com/default.asp ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ICHE/home.html ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/0899823X.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/ice.2015.59 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0899-823X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 3239.xml