MRM as a discovery tool?. Issue 7 (April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rudnick, Paul A.
• Is Part Of: Proteomics. Volume 15:Issue 7(2015:Apr.)
• Page Start: 1194
• Page End: 1195
• Publication Date: 2015-04
• Subjects: Proteins -- Separation -- Periodicals; Bioinformatics -- Periodicals; Proteomics -- Periodicals; Genomes -- Periodicals; Molecular genetics -- Periodicals; 572.605
• DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500090
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1615-9853

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Multiple‐reaction monitoring (MRM) of peptides has been recognized as a promising technology because it is sensitive and robust. Borrowed from stable‐isotope dilution (SID) methodologies in the field of small molecules, MRM is now routinely used in proteomics laboratories. While its usefulness validating candidate targets is widely accepted, it has not been established as a discovery tool. Traditional thinking has been that MRM workflows cannot be multiplexed high enough to efficiently profile. This is due to slower instrument scan rates and the complexities of developing increasingly large scheduling methods. In this issue, Colangelo et al. (<italic>Proteomics</italic> 2015, <italic>15</italic>, 1202–1214) describe a pipeline (xMRM) for discovery‐style MRM using label‐free methods (i.e. relative quantitation). Label‐free comes with cost benefits as does MRM, where data are easier to analyze than full‐scan. Their paper offers numerous improvements in method design and data analysis. The robustness of their pipeline was tested on rodent postsynaptic density fractions. There, they were able to accurately quantify 112 proteins at a CV% of 11.4, with only 2.5% of the 1697 transitions requiring user intervention. Colangelo et al. aim to extend the reach of MRM deeper into the realm of discovery proteomics, an area that is currently dominated by data‐dependent and data‐independent workflows.</p> </abstract>