Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications in Chinese patients having impacted mandibular third molars removed: a split-mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial. Issue 5 (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications in Chinese patients having impacted mandibular third molars removed: a split-mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial. Issue 5 (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications in Chinese patients having impacted mandibular third molars removed: a split-mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial
- Authors:
- Xue, P.
Wang, J.
Wu, B.
Ma, Y.
Wu, F.
Hou, R. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="spar0005">We investigated the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications after operations for impacted mandibular third molars in Chinese patients. A total of 207 patients had their bilateral third molars removed in a split-mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial in two visits. For one side amoxicillin (or clindamycin) was given (antibiotic group) from one hour before operation until 3 days postoperatively. For the other side a placebo was given (placebo group) at the same time. The outcome, including alveolar osteitis, surgical wound infection, prebuccal infection, and infection of the anterior isthmus of fauces, was assessed 2 and 10 days postoperatively. A total of 192 patients completed the study, and there was no difference between the groups in the incidence of inflammatory complications. In the treatment group, there were 4 cases of alveolar osteitis (2%), 2 infections of the wound (1%), and 14 other reactions (gastrointestinal (<italic>n</italic> = 4), bleeding (<italic>n</italic> = 2), ulcer (<italic>n</italic> = 2), and fever (<italic>n</italic> = 6)). In the placebo group, there were 6 cases of alveolar osteitis (3%), 2 wound infections (1%), and 22 other reactions (bleeding (<italic>n</italic> = 6), ulcer (<italic>n</italic> = 2) and fever (<italic>n</italic> = 14)). There was no significant difference in the extraction<abstract abstract-type="author" id="abs0005"> <title id="sect0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="spar0005">We investigated the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications after operations for impacted mandibular third molars in Chinese patients. A total of 207 patients had their bilateral third molars removed in a split-mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial in two visits. For one side amoxicillin (or clindamycin) was given (antibiotic group) from one hour before operation until 3 days postoperatively. For the other side a placebo was given (placebo group) at the same time. The outcome, including alveolar osteitis, surgical wound infection, prebuccal infection, and infection of the anterior isthmus of fauces, was assessed 2 and 10 days postoperatively. A total of 192 patients completed the study, and there was no difference between the groups in the incidence of inflammatory complications. In the treatment group, there were 4 cases of alveolar osteitis (2%), 2 infections of the wound (1%), and 14 other reactions (gastrointestinal (<italic>n</italic> = 4), bleeding (<italic>n</italic> = 2), ulcer (<italic>n</italic> = 2), and fever (<italic>n</italic> = 6)). In the placebo group, there were 6 cases of alveolar osteitis (3%), 2 wound infections (1%), and 22 other reactions (bleeding (<italic>n</italic> = 6), ulcer (<italic>n</italic> = 2) and fever (<italic>n</italic> = 14)). There was no significant difference in the extraction time and postoperative reactions, except the pain score on day 10 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.005). Prophylactic amoxicillin (or clindamycin) is not effective for the prevention or reduction of postoperative inflammatory complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars in Chinese patients.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Volume 53:Issue 5(2015)
- Journal:
- British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 53:Issue 5(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 53, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0053-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 416
- Page End:
- 420
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Dentistry, Operative -- Periodicals
Face -- surgery -- Periodicals
Mouth -- surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Oral -- Periodicals
Oral Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Dentistry, Operative -- Periodicals
Bouche -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Maxillaire supérieur -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Face -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Chirurgie dentaire -- Périodiques
Dentistry, Operative
Face -- Surgery
Maxilla -- Surgery
Mouth -- Surgery
Surgery, Plastic
Electronic journals
Periodicals
617.52059 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02664356 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0266-4356
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2314.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4170.xml