Religious vs. Conventional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression in Persons With Chronic Medical Illness. Issue 4 (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Religious vs. Conventional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression in Persons With Chronic Medical Illness. Issue 4 (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Religious vs. Conventional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression in Persons With Chronic Medical Illness
- Authors:
- Koenig, Harold G.
Pearce, Michelle J.
Nelson, Bruce
Shaw, Sally F.
Robins, Clive J.
Daher, Noha S.
Cohen, Harvey Jay
Berk, Lee S.
Bellinger, Denise L.
Pargament, Kenneth I.
Rosmarin, David H.
Vasegh, Sasan
Kristeller, Jean
Juthani, Nalini
Nies, Douglas
King, Michael B. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Abstract</title> <p>We examine the efficacy of conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) versus religiously integrated CBT (RCBT) in persons with major depression and chronic medical illness. Participants were randomized to either CCBT (<italic>n</italic> = 67) or RCBT (<italic>n</italic> = 65). The intervention in both groups consisted of ten 50-minute sessions delivered remotely during 12 weeks (94% by telephone). Adherence to treatment was similar, except in more religious participants in whom adherence to RCBT was slightly greater (85.7% <italic>vs.</italic> 65.9%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.10). The intention-to-treat analysis at 12 weeks indicated no significant difference in outcome between the two groups (<italic>B</italic> = 0.33; SE, 1.80; <italic>p</italic> = 0.86). Response rates and remission rates were also similar. Overall religiosity interacted with treatment group (<italic>B</italic> = −0.10; SE, 0.05; <italic>p</italic> = 0.048), suggesting that RCBT was slightly more efficacious in the more religious participants. These preliminary findings suggest that CCBT and RCBT are equivalent treatments of major depression in persons with chronic medical illness. Efficacy, as well as adherence, may be affected by client religiosity.</p> </sec> </abstract>
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of nervous and mental disease. Volume 203:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Journal of nervous and mental disease
- Issue:
- Volume 203:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 203, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 203
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0203-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Neurology
Psychiatry
Neurologie
Psychiatrie
Neurology
Psychiatry
Periodicals
616.8005 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1754691.html ↗
http://136.142.56.160/ovidweb/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&PAGE=toc&D=ovid%5fovft&AN=00005053-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.jonmd.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000273 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3018
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5021.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3628.xml