Attenuation of Exposure-response Rate Ratios at Higher Exposures. Issue 3 (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Steenland, Kyle; Karnes, Conny; Darrow, Lyndsey; Barry, Vaughn
• Is Part Of: Epidemiology. Volume 26:Issue 3(2015:May)
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.405
• DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1044-3983

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>Positive exposure-response trends for rate ratios (RRs) often diminish at higher exposures. Depletion of susceptibles with higher exposure and increased measurement error at higher exposures are possible reasons.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>We conducted simulations to investigate attenuation under various assumptions about susceptibility to exposure effects and measurement error, considering a hypothetical occupational cohort, using an excess relative risk model. We simulated an occupational cohort in which entry occurred over time. The metric of interest was cumulative exposure, which had a strong linear effect (RR = 4 for mean exposure), maximizing potential depletion. Measurement error of both classical and Berkson types was also simulated, increasing with increasing exposure. We conducted 100 simulations per scenario, each with 25, 000 subjects enrolled from years 1940 to 2010, followed through 2010.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>With less than 100% susceptibility to exposure (a requirement for depletion), there was only modest evidence of depletion of susceptibles with increasing cumulative exposure distributed normally. There was correspondingly little attenuation of RRs, and linear exposure-response models fit well. Adding classical measurement error to cumulative exposure, increasing with increasing exposure, resulted in some modest attenuation. Using log normal instead of normally distributed cumulative exposure also resulted in some attenuation.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>Strong attenuation of relatively strong linear exposure-response trends using cumulative exposure, with relatively common disease and heterogeneous susceptibility, does not appear likely due to depletion of susceptibles. Strong attenuation seems more likely to be due to other mechanisms.</p> </sec> </abstract>